Motorola Moto G82 vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 7, 2022 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.9 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.82 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 173 g 188.6 g
Height 160.9 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • White Lily
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.7 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.14 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G82 vs. Motorola Razr 40: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto G82 and the Motorola Razr 40, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G82Motorola Razr 40Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.9 x 74.5 x 8170.8 x 74 x 7.4Razr 40 is noticeably more compact when folded, significantly impacting pocketability.
Weight (g)173188.6Razr 40 is heavier due to its folding mechanism, but still manageable for everyday use.
FoldableNoYesRazr 40 offers the unique functionality and portability of a folding phone.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzLTPO AMOLED, 144HzRazr 40 boasts a smoother, more responsive display with potential for better battery efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.66.9Razr 40 offers a slightly larger main screen.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2640Both offer sharp visuals, but Razr 40 has a slightly higher pixel density.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Razr 40's newer, more powerful chipset delivers significantly better performance for demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz)Octa-core (2.4 GHz)Razr 40 offers faster processing speeds, leading to smoother multitasking and app loading.
RAM6GB/8GB8GB/12GBRazr 40's larger RAM options enable better multitasking and handle more demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera50MP64MPRazr 40's higher resolution main camera potentially captures more detailed photos.
Selfie Camera16MP32MPRazr 40 offers a higher resolution selfie camera for sharper self-portraits.
Battery Life
Battery Capacity5000mAh4200mAhMoto G82 boasts a larger battery capacity, likely resulting in longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

The Moto G82 prioritizes affordability and long battery life. Its large 5000mAh battery and 120Hz AMOLED display offer an excellent balance for media consumption and daily tasks. However, its performance capabilities are less impressive than the Razr 40.

The Razr 40, on the other hand, focuses on performance and cutting-edge design. Its foldable form factor, powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 processor, and stunning 144Hz display cater to users who value innovation and a premium experience. The trade-off is a smaller battery and a higher price tag.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G82: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and a large screen for media consumption, social media, and casual gaming.

Razr 40: Perfect for tech enthusiasts and trendsetters who desire a unique, compact foldable phone with strong performance for demanding tasks, multitasking, and mobile photography.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Moto G82 offers excellent value in the low-price range, while the Razr 40 sits in the mid-range segment.
  • Do you prioritize portability or battery life? The Razr 40's foldable design makes it incredibly compact, while the G82 boasts a larger battery.
  • How important is raw performance? The Razr 40 significantly outperforms the G82 thanks to its more powerful processor and larger RAM options.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a budget: Moto G82
  • Professional who values portability: Razr 40
  • Mobile gamer seeking high performance: Razr 40

My Choice: The Motorola Razr 40

While the Moto G82 offers incredible value, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40. The innovative foldable design truly intrigues me. As a tech journalist, I'm drawn to experiencing the cutting edge of mobile technology. The performance boost offered by the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, coupled with the smoother 144Hz display, aligns better with my workflow and content creation needs. While the battery life is a slight concern, the compact form factor and sheer coolness of a foldable phone outweigh that for me. I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of battery life for the unique experience and increased productivity the Razr 40 provides.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.