Motorola Moto G73 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 181 g 189 g
Height 161.4 mm 164.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto G73 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. I've taken a close look at the provided specs, and I'll break it all down for you in a way that's not just about numbers, but how these phones will actually feel in your hands.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Okay, here's a detailed breakdown of the specifications, along with their real-world implications:

FeatureMotorola Moto G73ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
DESIGN
Dimensions161.4 × 73.8 × 8.3 mm164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mmG73 is slightly more compact, easier to handle with one hand, the A75 is slightly taller, wider and thicker
Weight181g189gG73 is noticeably lighter. Difference is felt during extended use, G73 is easier to carry on long periods
DISPLAY
Size6.5"6.6"Very similar size. G73 has a slightly smaller screen, both are great for content consumption
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612The G73's display will be noticeably sharper with more detail. A75 has lower resolution, might look less detailed
Pixel Density (PPI)405267G73 will display crisper text and images. A75 is significantly lower and may appear less sharp.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth have good viewing angles and colors, though IPS LCD has limitations compared to OLED.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzG73 display will feel smoother, especially when scrolling and gaming. A75 is less fluid but adequate.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have similar peak brightness, though both lack specific brightness value - might be challenging in bright sunlight
PERFORMANCE
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)The G73 is significantly faster and more efficient, more capable for gaming and heavy usage. The A75 is slower
AnTuTu Score497,466240,000The G73 is over twice as fast. Provides noticeably smoother performance for gaming and demanding apps. The A75 is not ideal
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G57 MP1The G73 has superior graphics processing. Faster rendering and overall better gaming performance. A75's GPU is basic.
CAMERA
Standard Camera50MP f/1.8, 1.00 µm50MP f/1.8Both phones will have comparable primary image quality in good lighting, though actual sensors are different
Selfie Camera16MP f/2.4, 1.00 µm8MPG73 will take sharper and more detailed selfies. The A75's front camera is adequate, not great for details
Wide Angle Lens8MP f/2.2, 1.12 µmNot AvailableThe G73 can capture wider perspectives; the A75 lacks this, limiting flexibility in shots.
Video Recording1080p @ 30/60fps, Slow-Mo (240 fps)1080p @ 30fps, Slow-Mo (30fps)The G73 has higher frame rates and better slow-motion quality
Additional Features4K Video, Front Flash, Night Mode, Ultra Stable VideoPDAFG73 has more advanced video features. A75 offers faster auto focus capabilities
BATTERY
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones should offer similar battery life for moderate use.
Charging30W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingThe G73 charges faster allowing shorter wait times. The A75 slower charging time means longer charging periods.
SOFTWARE
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both are running Android 13
CONNECTIVITY
Wi-Fi802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax802.11 a/b/g/n/acThe G73 supports WiFi 6 for faster and more efficient internet connections, the A75 lacks it
Bluetooth5.3 LE with aptX, LDAC, AAC5.0 LEThe G73 has a more modern Bluetooth for better audio codecs and more reliable wireless connectivity
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), BeiDou (B1), NavIC SystemGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoThe G73 has more robust and accurate location services thanks to more supported systems.
STORAGE
Internal128GB / 256 GB128 GB/ 256 GBBoth phones offer similar storage options.
RAM8 GB4GB/8GBThe G73 comes standard with 8GB, the A75 comes with 4GB or 8GB. This will affect multitasking performance significantly
AUDIO
FeaturesDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesDTS / DTS XThe G73 offers more immersive audio experience, better voice recording quality. The A75 has DTS for improved audio
SECURITY
FeaturesSide-mounted Fingerprint sensorSide-mounted Fingerprint sensorBoth phones offer similar security features for biometric authentication
SENSORS
FeaturesBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, CompassBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, GyroscopeG73 includes a compass, A75 includes a gyroscope (different use cases)

2. Key Insights

  • Motorola Moto G73:
    • Strengths: Significantly superior performance thanks to its Dimensity 930 chip, a sharper display with a 120Hz refresh rate, better camera setup with a wider lens and 4K video, more advanced audio features like Dolby Atmos, faster charging, newer Bluetooth and Wi-Fi standards for better connectivity, and more robust GPS capabilities. It also comes standard with more RAM and is significantly lighter, adding to ease of use.
    • Competitive Advantages: Offers a premium mid-range experience at a competitive price. Its performance is excellent for its class, making it great for gaming, multitasking, and media consumption. The more advanced camera system also makes it a better all rounder for pictures and videos.
    • Limitations: Lacks expandable storage, and peak brightness is not known, possibly meaning some visibility limitations in direct sunlight.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G:
    • Strengths: A more affordable entry-level option. The display size is similar, but it lacks the detail and sharpness of the Moto G73's display. Battery life should be similar to the G73.
    • Competitive Advantages: Offers a basic smartphone experience at a lower cost, suitable for very light usage. It offers Dual SIM and similar storage options to the G73. It also has more flexibility in that it comes in 4GB RAM and 8GB RAM options.
    • Limitations: Considerably slower performance, lower display resolution, basic camera setup without a wide lens, older Bluetooth version, lower refresh rate, and less capable GPS. The camera is not as versatile, offering less image quality.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Motorola Moto G73:
    • Ideal For: Users who want a smooth and responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, need good camera capabilities, stream a lot of media, and appreciate features like Dolby Atmos audio. Also best for people who rely on accurate GPS or a good signal in crowded areas.
    • Use Cases: Perfect for gaming, multitasking between several apps, taking photos and videos, and watching movies. It’s also good for power users who need a reliable and fast device for everyday use.
    • Value Proposition: Offers a lot of performance and features for its price, making it a great value option in the mid-range segment.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G:
    • Ideal For: Users who primarily need a basic phone for calling, messaging, browsing, and light social media use, are less demanding in terms of performance, want a very budget-friendly device and prefer to save as much money as possible.
    • Use Cases: Great for making calls, sending texts, checking emails, and light social media browsing. It is less suitable for gaming or video-heavy usage.
    • Value Proposition: An entry level smartphone that performs basic tasks at a low price point.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. How important is performance to you? If you prioritize smooth, responsive performance, gaming, and multitasking, the Moto G73 is the clear choice. The ZTE is more suited to light, basic use.
  2. How much do you value display quality? If you appreciate a sharp, vibrant display with a higher refresh rate for fluid visuals, the Moto G73 is much better. The ZTE has a lower resolution display and can look less detailed.
  3. What is your budget? The ZTE is much more affordable and therefore a viable option for low-budget use cases. If you have a larger budget, the Motorola is the obvious choice.

Scenario Recommendations:

  • Budget Conscious: If you absolutely need to save money and just want a basic phone, the ZTE will be enough.
  • Mid-Range Gamer: If you plan on doing any level of mobile gaming, the Moto G73 provides smooth and fluid gameplay.
  • Power User: For those who use their phone for work, streaming, social media, and want the best all-round experience, the Moto G73 will serve you much better.
  • Photo/Video Enthusiast: If you take a lot of photos or record videos and want good quality, the Moto G73 is much more capable.

Final Decision

If I were choosing between these two, I would go for the Motorola Moto G73, hands down.

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G is more budget-friendly, the Motorola Moto G73 offers a vastly superior experience in almost every single category, especially in performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and audio. For me, the smoother user experience, better gaming performance, and superior camera are worth the extra investment, and the additional features like better connectivity, fast charging, and a superior GPS system would make all the difference in daily use.

The G73 is simply a much better all-rounder that won't leave you wanting more.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.