Motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 181 g 222 g
Height 161.4 mm 162.3 mm
Width 73.8 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1M35 slightly larger and thicker
Weight (g)181222G73 noticeably lighter, more comfortable for one-handed use
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzM35 offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology. Both have smooth scrolling thanks to 120Hz.
Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible difference in screen real estate
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm) likely offers better performance and power efficiency due to the smaller manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)M35 has a higher clock speed on performance cores, indicating potentially better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G68 MP5Mali-G68 MP5 generally offers better graphics performance for gaming.
RAM8GB8GBIdentical RAM capacity for multitasking
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 8MP Wide50MP Main (OIS), 8MP Wide, 2MP MacroM35 benefits from Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and videos, especially in low light. Macro lens adds versatility but may not be of high quality given the low resolution.
Front Camera16MP13MPG73 has a slightly higher resolution front camera
Video Recording1080p@60fps4K@30fps with EISM35 can record higher resolution video with electronic image stabilization
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh6000 mAhM35 offers significantly longer battery life
Charging30W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingG73 charges slightly faster despite lower wattage due to smaller battery. Actual charging times may vary.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: More comfortable for one-handed use and portability.
  • Slightly faster charging: Potentially quicker top-ups.
  • Higher resolution selfie camera: Potentially better for video calls and self-portraits.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED offers richer colors and deeper blacks.
  • More Powerful Processor and GPU: Smoother performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Significantly Larger Battery: Longer usage time between charges.
  • Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Sharper photos and videos, especially in low light.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: 4K recording capability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G73: Users prioritizing a lightweight, compact phone with decent performance and fast charging. Suitable for everyday tasks, social media, and casual photography. Good value for its price range.

Samsung Galaxy M35: Users who value a vibrant display, long battery life, excellent camera quality (especially in low light), and strong performance for gaming and demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is battery life? If all-day battery is crucial, the M35 is the clear winner.
  2. Is camera quality a priority? The M35 offers OIS and 4K video recording for superior image and video quality.
  3. What is your budget? While both are mid-range, price differences might exist depending on region and storage configuration.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Moto G73 offers a compelling lightweight design and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy M35 provides a more well-rounded package. The superior AMOLED display, significantly longer battery life, more powerful processor, and the inclusion of OIS for the camera make it a better long-term investment for my needs. The slightly larger size and weight are acceptable trade-offs for the significant gains in other areas. The ability to record 4K video is also a significant advantage for capturing memories. Even if the M35 is slightly more expensive, the added features justify the price difference for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.