Motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 181 g 209 g
Height 161.4 mm 161.7 mm
Width 73.8 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Samsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2A35 slightly wider, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use. Negligible difference in thickness.
Weight (g)181209G73 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzA35's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency. Both have smooth 120Hz refresh rates.
Size (inches)6.56.6A35 slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
Peak BrightnessNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)A35's 5nm process likely more power-efficient. Performance differences depend on specific tasks and optimization; benchmarks would be helpful.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A35 has higher clock speeds on performance cores, potentially offering better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G68 MP5Performance differences depend on specific tasks and optimization; benchmarks would be helpful.
RAM8GB6GB/8GB8GB RAM on both high-end A35 versions provide smoother multitasking. Base A35 model with 6GB might experience occasional slowdowns.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A35 comes with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security updates.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 8MP Wide50MP Main (OIS), 8MP Wide, 5MP MacroA35 benefits from Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for steadier photos and videos. A35 also features a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots.
Front Camera16MP13MPG73 boasts higher resolution front camera, but image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30/60fps with EISA35 offers 4K video recording and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) on all video resolutions, resulting in superior video quality and stability.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on other factors like display and processor efficiency.
Charging30W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingG73 slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Lighter: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Potentially Cheaper: Prices suggest G73 might be more affordable.

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • AMOLED Display: Superior contrast, colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
  • More Powerful CPU: Potentially smoother performance in demanding tasks.
  • Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Significantly improved photo and video stability.
  • 4K Video Recording: Higher resolution video capture.
  • Newer Android Version: Longer software support and newer features.
  • Under-display Fingerprint Sensor: More modern and potentially more aesthetically pleasing.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G73: Budget-conscious users prioritizing a lightweight phone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and light media consumption.

Samsung Galaxy A35: Users looking for a well-rounded mid-range phone with a great display, good performance, capable camera with OIS, and longer software updates. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
  2. Display Quality: Is an AMOLED display with vibrant colors a priority?
  3. Camera Needs: Is OIS and 4K video recording important?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: Moto G73
  • Balanced Needs, Good Value: Samsung Galaxy A35

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Motorola Moto G73 offers a lighter weight and potentially lower price, the Samsung Galaxy A35 provides a significantly better overall package. The AMOLED display, more powerful processor, optical image stabilization, 4K video recording, and newer Android version are substantial advantages that outweigh the weight difference. The under-display fingerprint sensor is also a more modern and preferable solution for me. While benchmarks would offer a more definitive performance comparison, the A35's specifications suggest a more future-proof device. Ultimately, the A35's superior features justify the likely price premium for a more satisfying user experience in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.