Motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 181 g 199 g
Height 161.4 mm 161.3 mm
Width 73.8 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Samsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2A34 slightly wider, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)181199G73 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzA34's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency. G73's LCD might be brighter in direct sunlight.
Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Dimensity 1080 generally offers slightly better CPU and GPU performance, leading to smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A34 has a higher clock speed on its performance cores, resulting in faster app loading and more responsive performance.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G68 MC4Mali-G68 MC4 generally provides better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)86/8 (Variant dependent)8GB RAM on the G73 ensures smoother multitasking compared to the 6GB A34 variant.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main + 8MP Wide48MP Main + 8MP Wide + 5MP Macro + 5MP DepthA34 offers more versatile camera setup with dedicated macro and depth sensors.
Front Camera16MP13MPResolution difference might not translate to significant real-world selfie quality difference; other factors like image processing are crucial.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fpsA34 can record in 4K resolution, providing higher detail in videos.
Optical Image StabilizationNoYesA34's OIS will result in significantly more stable videos and potentially better low-light photos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery life expected.
Fast Charging30W25WG73 charges slightly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Lighter: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Faster Charging: Less downtime.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Depending on specific configurations.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED offers vibrant colors and deeper blacks.
  • Better Performance: Dimensity 1080 provides a smoother user experience.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Macro and depth sensors allow for more creative photography.
  • Optical Image Stabilization: Results in significantly better video and low-light performance.
  • Longer Software Support: Samsung typically provides more OS updates.

Trade-offs:

  • The A34's superior features come at the cost of a higher price and heavier weight.
  • The G73 prioritizes affordability and lightness but compromises on display quality and camera versatility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G73: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and casual photography.

Samsung Galaxy A34: Users who value a vibrant display, smooth performance, versatile camera, and longer software support. Suitable for mobile gaming, content consumption, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The G73 is generally more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Casual use vs. demanding tasks like gaming and photography.
  3. How important is display quality and camera versatility? The A34 excels in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Moto G73 offers a compelling value proposition with its lightweight design and fast charging, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is the better overall phone for me. The AMOLED display is a significant upgrade, offering a much more enjoyable viewing experience. The superior performance of the Dimensity 1080 and the inclusion of optical image stabilization greatly enhance the user experience, especially for photography and video recording. While heavier and potentially more expensive, the A34's advantages in key areas outweigh the drawbacks for my personal preferences and usage patterns. The longer software updates are also a crucial factor in ensuring a longer lifespan for the device.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.