Motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy A15 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 103.28 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.25 "/g
Weight 181 g 200 g
Height 161.4 mm 160.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Magical Blue
  • Personality Yellow

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.3 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 48.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Samsung Galaxy A15Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4Moto G73 is slightly taller and narrower, potentially feeling more comfortable in hand for some users.
Weight (g)181200Moto G73 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 90HzA15's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency in dark mode. G73's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Negligible real-world difference in sharpness.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified800A15's higher peak brightness ensures better outdoor visibility. Missing spec for G73 limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Dimensity 930 generally offers better performance in demanding tasks and gaming due to its slightly more powerful CPU and GPU.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)While clock speeds are similar, the A78 cores in the G73 are newer and more efficient than the A76 cores in the A15.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G57 MC2G73's GPU should provide a smoother gaming experience.
RAM8GB4GB/6GB/8GB (Variant Dependent)More RAM in the reviewed G73 variant enables better multitasking and app switching compared to the base A15 model.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A15 launches with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 8MP Ultrawide50MP Main, 5MP Ultrawide, 2MP MacroBoth offer similar main camera resolution. G73's ultrawide likely provides better image quality. A15 includes a dedicated macro lens, but its low resolution limits practical use.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsG73 offers more video recording options including 60fps.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life.
Fast Charging30W25WG73 offers slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Smoother Performance: Dimensity 930, more RAM, and 120Hz display deliver a more responsive experience.
  • Better Gaming: Superior GPU and higher refresh rate.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Faster Charging: Reduces downtime.

Samsung Galaxy A15 Advantages:

  • Vivid Display: AMOLED technology offers richer colors and deeper blacks.
  • Newer Android Version: Potentially longer software support and newer features.
  • More Color Options: Greater personalization.
  • More RAM/Storage Configuration Options: Allows users to choose the variant that best fits their needs and budget.

Trade-offs:

  • G73: IPS LCD display vs. AMOLED, older Android Version
  • A15: Lower performance, slower refresh rate, potentially shorter software support lifespan depending on the variant.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G73: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, smooth display, and a lightweight design. Gamers, multitaskers, and those sensitive to phone weight will appreciate the G73.

Samsung Galaxy A15: Suits users who value display quality and vibrant colors over peak performance. Casual users, social media enthusiasts, and those on a tighter budget might find the A15 appealing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is display quality or performance more important?
  2. What's your budget and desired storage capacity?
  3. How important is software update longevity?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Moto G73
  • Budget-conscious user: Samsung Galaxy A15 (base variant)
  • User prioritizing display quality: Samsung Galaxy A15

My Choice: Motorola Moto G73

While the Samsung Galaxy A15 offers a vibrant AMOLED display and a newer Android version, the Motorola Moto G73 is the better overall package for me. The superior performance offered by the Dimensity 930, coupled with the 120Hz refresh rate, would provide a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience in day-to-day use and especially in gaming. The lighter weight is also a significant factor for me, as I value comfort during extended use. While the AMOLED display on the A15 is tempting, the performance advantages and smoother display of the G73 outweigh the benefits for my personal preferences. I'm also willing to accept the slightly older Android version, as the performance difference would be more impactful in my daily usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.