Motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy A05 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 October 15, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 116.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 181 g 195 g
Height 161.4 mm 168.8 mm
Width 73.8 mm 78.2 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 82.1 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 262 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 43.04 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Samsung Galaxy A05Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8Moto G73 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)181195Moto G73 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialMissingMissingCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.56.7Galaxy A05 has a slightly larger screen, offering a more immersive viewing experience but potentially less one-hand usability.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1600Moto G73 has a significantly sharper display (405 ppi vs 262 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzPLS LCDMoto G73's 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience. PLS LCD generally offers slightly better color reproduction than standard IPS.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)Dimensity 930 is built on a smaller node (6nm vs 12nm), likely resulting in better power efficiency and performance in the Moto G73.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G73 has faster and more modern CPU cores, translating to quicker app loading, multitasking, and potentially better gaming performance.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G52 MC2Moto G73 likely has a more powerful GPU, enabling smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. More details on specific GPU performance are needed for a definitive comparison.
RAM8GB4GB/6GBMoto G73 offers more RAM in the provided configuration, enabling better multitasking and reducing app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPMegapixel count is the same, but sensor quality, aperture, and image processing will determine the actual image quality. More details needed for comparison.
Ultrawide8MPMissingMoto G73 offers an ultrawide camera for capturing wider scenes, a feature absent in the Galaxy A05.
Selfie Camera16MP8MPMoto G73 has a higher resolution selfie camera, likely resulting in better quality self-portraits.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBoth phones have the same battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and usage patterns.
Fast Charging30W25WMoto G73 supports slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Dimensity 930 chipset, faster CPU, more RAM, and potentially better GPU provide a noticeable performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Smoother Display: The 120Hz refresh rate offers a significantly more fluid user experience.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution results in crisper visuals.
  • Ultrawide Camera: Adds versatility for capturing wider shots.
  • Faster Charging: Reduces downtime.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Improves one-handed usability and portability.

Samsung Galaxy A05 Advantages:

  • Slightly Larger Display: More immersive for media consumption.
  • Lower Price: Potentially more budget-friendly. (Based on "price_range" information)

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G73: Users who prioritize performance, a smooth display, and camera versatility. Ideal for gaming, multitasking, and content creation.

Samsung Galaxy A05: Budget-conscious users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media browsing. The larger screen is beneficial for media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Galaxy A05 is in a lower price range.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Gaming and multitasking benefit from the Moto G73's performance, while casual usage might not necessitate such power.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize a smooth display and camera versatility? Choose the Moto G73. Prioritize a large screen and affordability? Consider the Galaxy A05.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G73

While the Samsung Galaxy A05 offers a larger display and lower price, the Motorola Moto G73 provides significantly more value due to its superior performance, smoother and sharper display, versatile camera system, and faster charging. The performance difference alone would greatly impact daily usage, making the Moto G73 a more future-proof and enjoyable device to use. The lighter and more compact design is also a plus for me. Unless budget is extremely tight, the Moto G73 is the clear winner in this comparison.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.