Motorola Moto G73 vs Oppo Find N3 Flip - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 September 8, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 98.38 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.43 "/g
Weight 181 g 198 g
Height 161.4 mm 166.4 mm
Width 73.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Cream Gold
  • Misty Pink
  • Sleek Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2520
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 403 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 92.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 43.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4300 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Immortalis-G715 MC11

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Oppo Find N3 FlipPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8The Oppo is slightly larger but thinner. Foldable design makes it more compact when closed.
Weight (g)181198The Oppo is noticeably heavier.
FoldableNoYesOppo's foldable design offers portability and a unique form factor.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.8Larger display on the Oppo offers more screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2520Both have similar pixel density, resulting in sharp visuals. Oppo's slightly taller aspect ratio.
TypeIPS LCD, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 120HzOppo boasts superior AMOLED technology with richer colors, deeper blacks, and potential for better battery efficiency due to LTPO.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified1600Missing brightness data for the Moto G73 makes comparison difficult. Oppo's high brightness ensures good outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)Oppo's 9200 chip offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to the 4nm process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz X3 & 3x2.85 GHz A715 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Oppo has a more powerful CPU architecture, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)812More RAM on the Oppo enables better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding apps.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 8MP Wide50MP Main (IMX890), 48MP Wide (IMX581), 32MP Telephoto (IMX709)Oppo features a triple camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, offering greater versatility. Superior sensor hardware in the Oppo likely results in better image quality.
Selfie Camera16MP32MP (IMX709)Oppo has a higher resolution selfie camera with a potentially better sensor, likely producing superior selfies.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004300Larger battery in the Moto G73 suggests longer battery life, but real-world usage can vary.
Fast Charging30W44WOppo supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life (Potentially): The 5000mAh battery likely outlasts the Oppo's 4300mAh battery.
  • Lower Price: The Moto G73 is positioned in a lower price bracket.

Oppo Find N3 Flip Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: The Dimensity 9200 and 12GB RAM provide a substantial performance advantage.
  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology with HDR10+ offers vibrant colors and deeper blacks.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Triple camera setup with telephoto lens enables optical zoom and diverse shooting options. Higher quality sensors likely produce better images.
  • Faster Charging: 44W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Foldable Design: Offers unique portability and usability advantages.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G73:

  • Budget-conscious users: Prioritize affordability and long battery life.
  • Basic smartphone users: Primarily use their phone for calling, texting, social media, and light browsing.

Oppo Find N3 Flip:

  • Power users: Demand high performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Value a versatile camera system with high-quality sensors and optical zoom.
  • Users seeking a unique form factor: Appreciate the portability and novelty of a foldable phone.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G73 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy users will benefit from the Oppo's performance.
  3. How important is camera quality and versatility? The Oppo offers a clear advantage in this area.

My Choice: Oppo Find N3 Flip

While the Motorola Moto G73 offers excellent value for its price, the Oppo Find N3 Flip is the superior device overall. The significantly improved performance, superior display, more versatile camera system, and faster charging outweigh the price difference and larger battery of the Moto G73 for me. The foldable form factor, while adding to the cost, offers a unique advantage in portability and usability. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality photos, and fast charging, making the Oppo the clear winner. The price premium is justified by the substantial upgrade in features and overall experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.