Motorola Moto G73 vs Nothing Phone (2a) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 March 12, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 106.1 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 181 g 190 g
Height 161.4 mm 161.7 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Milk

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 87.6 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1100 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Nothing Phone (2a)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3161.7 x 76.3 x 8.6Phone (2a) is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)181190Phone (2a) is slightly heavier, might be noticeable in extended use.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based, but under-display is often perceived as more modern.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+Phone (2a) offers significantly better contrast, color accuracy, and peak brightness due to AMOLED technology and HDR10+ support.
Display Size (inches)6.56.7Phone (2a) has a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001084 x 2412Virtually identical resolutions, negligible real-world difference.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified1300Phone (2a)'s superior peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Lack of data for the Moto G73 prevents a full comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm)Phone (2a)'s 4nm process suggests better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance. Dimensity 7200 Pro generally benchmarks higher than the 930.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510)Phone (2a) has faster prime cores for improved performance in demanding tasks.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G610 MC4Mali-G610 MC4 generally offers better gaming performance than the IMG BXM-8-256.
RAM8GB12GB (as tested)The Phone (2a) configuration offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and less frequent app reloading.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.88, Samsung GN9 sensor, OISPhone (2a) benefits from OIS for steadier videos and potentially better low-light photos. The specified sensor on the Phone (2a) is known for good performance.
Ultrawide Camera8MP, f/2.250MP, f/2.2, Samsung JN1 sensorPhone (2a) has a significantly higher resolution ultrawide, capturing more detail.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.432MP, f/2.2, Sony IMX615 sensorPhone (2a)'s higher resolution selfie camera with a known good sensor should produce better quality selfies.
Video Recording1080p@60fps4K@30fps with EISPhone (2a) offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity.
Charging30W fast charging45W fast chargingPhone (2a) charges significantly faster.
ExtrasNo charger in boxMoto G73 likely includes a charger.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.
  • Likely Includes Charger: No need for a separate purchase.

Nothing Phone (2a) Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with HDR10+ for vibrant colors and deep blacks.
  • Higher Performance: More powerful chipset and GPU for smoother gaming and multitasking. More RAM in the configuration analyzed.
  • Better Camera System: Higher resolution ultrawide and selfie cameras, OIS on the main camera.
  • Faster Charging: 45W charging for quicker top-ups.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates to Android 17.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G73: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and reliability. Ideal for:

  • Calling, texting, and web browsing
  • Casual social media use
  • Light photography

Nothing Phone (2a): Users who value performance, a premium display, and a capable camera system. Ideal for:

  • Mobile gaming
  • Content consumption (videos, photos)
  • Photography enthusiasts
  • Users who value longer software update cycles.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G73 is a more budget-friendly option.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? For basic tasks, the G73 suffices. For demanding tasks and media consumption, the Phone (2a) excels.
  3. How important are display quality, camera performance, and charging speed? The Phone (2a) significantly outperforms the G73 in these areas.

My Choice: Nothing Phone (2a)

While the Motorola Moto G73 is a respectable budget option, the Nothing Phone (2a) offers a significantly better overall user experience. The superior AMOLED display, more powerful processor, better camera system with OIS, and faster charging are compelling advantages. The longer software support commitment also adds value. While the Phone (2a) is more expensive, the enhanced features justify the price difference for users who value performance, display quality, and a capable camera. The lack of a charger in the box is a minor inconvenience easily overcome.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.