Motorola Moto G73 vs Nothing Phone (2) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 July 17, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 106.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 181 g 201.2 g
Height 161.4 mm 162.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • White
  • Dark Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 87.2 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 44.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Nothing Phone (2)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6Nothing Phone (2) is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)181201.2Moto G73 is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality can't be compared without further information.
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 120HzLTPO OLED, 120HzNothing Phone (2) offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Size (inches)6.56.7Nothing Phone (2) provides a slightly larger viewing area.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Negligible difference in sharpness.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1600 nitsNothing Phone (2) will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Nothing Phone (2) boasts significantly more powerful CPU and GPU, enabling smoother multitasking, gaming, and demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Nothing Phone (2)'s CPU architecture is more modern and powerful.
RAM8GB8/12GB12GB option on Nothing Phone (2) enhances multitasking and future-proofs the device.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.88, Sony IMX890Both have 50MP sensors, but the Nothing Phone (2) utilizes a larger, more advanced sensor (IMX890) potentially capturing better detail and low-light performance.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.250MP, f/2.2, Samsung JN1Nothing Phone (2) features a significantly higher resolution ultrawide, capturing more detail.
Selfie16MP, f/2.432MP, f/2.45Nothing Phone (2) offers a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fpsNothing Phone (2) allows for higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4700 mAhMoto G73 has slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life, though real-world usage varies.
Charging30W wired45W wired, 15W WirelessNothing Phone (2) supports faster wired charging and offers wireless charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Lighter and potentially longer battery life: More comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods without charging.
  • Lower price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.

Nothing Phone (2) Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher quality display: OLED provides vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and improved power efficiency.
  • More versatile camera system: Higher resolution ultrawide and advanced main sensor offer better image and video quality.
  • Faster charging and wireless charging: Offers more convenient charging options.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G73:

  • Budget-conscious users: Prioritizing affordability over top-tier performance.
  • Casual users: Primarily using their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media.

Nothing Phone (2):

  • Power users: Demanding performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Seeking a versatile camera system for high-quality photos and videos.
  • Tech-savvy users: Appreciating the latest technology and features like wireless charging and a high refresh rate OLED display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G73 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Casual users might find the Moto G73 sufficient, while power users will prefer the Nothing Phone (2).
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize battery life, camera quality, display quality, performance, and charging convenience.

My Choice: Nothing Phone (2)

While the Motorola Moto G73 offers excellent value for its price, the Nothing Phone (2) is the superior device overall. The significantly improved performance, higher quality display, more versatile camera system, and faster charging outweigh the price difference for me. The slightly larger size and weight are minor trade-offs for the substantial performance and feature upgrades. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ensures a smooth and future-proof experience, while the superior camera system allows capturing higher quality photos and videos. The inclusion of wireless charging adds convenience. As someone who values performance and a premium user experience, the Nothing Phone (2) is the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.