Motorola Moto G73 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 181 g 189 g
Height 161.4 mm 171.4 mm
Width 73.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Motorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3171.4 x 74 x 7.1Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more compact when folded, making it highly pocketable. However, it's taller and slightly wider unfolded.
Weight (g)181189Negligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 Ultra's foldable design offers unique portability and a smaller external display for quick interactions.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.9Razr 50 Ultra provides a larger main screen for immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2640Slightly sharper image on the Razr 50 Ultra due to higher pixel density, but practically indistinguishable.
TypeIPS LCD, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 165HzRazr 50 Ultra offers superior contrast, brighter colors, smoother scrolling, and potential for better battery life due to LTPO.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 930Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Razr 50 Ultra boasts significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, enabling smoother multitasking and high-end gaming.
RAM (GB)812More RAM on the Razr 50 Ultra allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdown.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Razr 50 Ultra benefits from newer OS features and potentially longer software support with updates to Android 17 confirmed.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable main camera resolution; however, sensor details suggest the Razr 50 Ultra likely captures better quality images.
Additional Cameras8MP Wide Angle50MP Telephoto, 32MP SelfieRazr 50 Ultra features a versatile camera system with telephoto capabilities and a higher-resolution selfie camera.
Video1080p@60fps4K@60fpsRazr 50 Ultra offers significantly higher video resolution and frame rates for more detailed and smoother recordings.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004000Moto G73 offers a larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life despite the less efficient display.
Charging30W Fast Charging45W Fast ChargingRazr 50 Ultra charges faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life (Potential): Larger battery capacity combined with a less demanding display may result in longer usage time.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in a more affordable price range.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and more RAM for smooth multitasking and demanding applications.
  • Higher Quality Display: Foldable AMOLED with richer colors, higher refresh rate, and HDR support.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens and higher resolution selfie camera offer greater flexibility.
  • More Compact When Folded: Foldable design provides unique portability.
  • Faster Charging: 45W charging significantly reduces downtime.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 50 Ultra: Higher price for the foldable design, advanced features, and top-tier performance. Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Moto G73 despite the smaller battery size.
  • Moto G73: Compromises on performance, display quality, and camera versatility for a lower price point and potentially longer battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G73: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and essential smartphone functionalities. Ideal for:

  • Casual users focusing on communication, social media, and web browsing.
  • Users seeking an affordable phone with decent performance.

Razr 50 Ultra: Users who value cutting-edge technology, premium design, and top-tier performance. Ideal for:

  • Power users who demand smooth multitasking and high-end gaming capabilities.
  • Users who prioritize portability and a compact form factor.
  • Content creators who require a high-quality camera and large display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Razr 50 Ultra commands a significantly higher price.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Razr 50 Ultra is the clear winner.
  3. How important is portability and design? The Razr 50 Ultra's foldable design offers unparalleled portability.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

While the Moto G73 offers excellent value for its price, the Razr 50 Ultra's superior performance, stunning display, versatile camera system, and innovative foldable design are compelling. The faster charging mitigates some concern over the smaller battery capacity. The longer software update commitment ensures the phone will remain relevant for an extended period. As someone who values cutting-edge technology and a premium user experience, the Razr 50 Ultra aligns better with my needs, despite the higher price. The compact size when folded is a significant advantage for daily carry. The performance difference between the Dimensity 930 and Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 would be noticeable in everyday use, especially for multitasking and demanding apps.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.