Motorola Moto G73 vs Motorola Moto G04s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 April 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 97.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 181 g 178.8 g
Height 161.4 mm 163.5 mm
Width 73.8 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Sea Green
  • Concord Black
  • Satin Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 51.31 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Motorola Moto G04sPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3163.5 x 74.5 x 8.0G73 is slightly smaller and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)181178.8Virtually identical weight; no noticeable difference.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.56Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612G73 has significantly sharper display (405 ppi vs 269 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzG73 offers smoother scrolling and animations, noticeable in day-to-day use and gaming.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles. Missing information on color depth and HDR capabilities limits further analysis.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Dimensity 930 is more powerful and efficient due to smaller manufacturing process, leading to better performance and battery life.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)G73 has faster and more powerful CPU cores, translating to significantly better performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G57 MP1G73 has a more powerful GPU, leading to better gaming performance and smoother graphics rendering.
RAM8GB4GBG73 offers double the RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPBoth have 50MP main sensors. However, missing sensor model and size information for the G73 limits detailed comparison. G04s specifies a Samsung S5KJN1 sensor with pixel binning, potentially improving low-light performance.
Ultrawide8MPNo ultrawideG73 offers an ultrawide lens for broader field of view in photos and videos, while G04s lacks this feature.
Selfie Camera16MP5MPG73 has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera, likely resulting in better quality selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsG73 can record at 60fps, providing smoother video footage.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity. Actual battery life will depend on usage and efficiency of other components.
Fast Charging30W15WG73 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and double the RAM.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and refresh rate.
  • Faster Charging: 30W vs 15W.
  • Ultrawide Camera: Adds versatility for photography.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Better selfie quality.

Motorola Moto G04s Advantages:

  • Potentially Better Low-Light Camera Performance: Due to pixel binning on the main sensor (assuming similar sensor size to G73, which is unknown).
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G73: Users who prioritize performance, a smooth display, faster charging, and camera versatility (ultrawide lens). Suitable for gaming, multitasking, and content consumption.

Motorola Moto G04s: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and potentially better low-light camera performance. Suitable for everyday tasks like calling, texting, social media browsing, and casual photography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The G04s is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your performance needs? The G73 offers significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  3. What are your camera priorities? The G73 offers an ultrawide lens and higher resolution selfie camera, while the G04s might offer better low-light performance.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G73

While the Moto G04s offers a lower price point, the Moto G73 provides significantly better value due to its superior performance, smoother display, faster charging, and more versatile camera system. The difference in processing power, RAM, and display quality would noticeably impact daily use, making the G73 a more future-proof and enjoyable device to use in the long run. The faster charging is also a significant advantage in today's fast-paced world. The potential low-light advantage of the G04s isn't enough to offset the substantial performance and feature gap, especially since critical sensor details are missing for a proper comparison.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.