Motorola Moto G73 vs Google Pixel Fold - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 June 27, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.86 cm³ 128.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 2.69 "/g
Weight 181 g 283 g
Height 161.4 mm 139.7 mm
Width 73.8 mm 158.7 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 5.8 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 7.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1840 x 2208
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 82.7 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 378 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1450 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 83.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.57 mAh/cm³ 37.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4821 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G710 MP7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G73Google Pixel FoldPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 (folded)
139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 (unfolded)
Pixel Fold significantly smaller when folded, but larger unfolded due to its foldable nature. Moto G73 is a more traditional candybar form factor.
Weight (g)181283Pixel Fold is noticeably heavier due to its complex hinge mechanism and larger display.
FoldableNoYesPixel Fold offers a larger tablet-like screen when unfolded, enhancing multitasking and media consumption.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzFoldable OLED, 120HzPixel Fold's OLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially brighter highlights. G73's LCD might be visible in direct sunlight. Foldable design provides versatility.
Display Size (inches)6.55.8 (cover), 7.6 (unfolded)Pixel Fold offers a compact outer display for quick tasks and a significantly larger inner display for immersive experiences.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2092 (cover), 1840 x 2208 (unfolded)Both offer sharp displays, but Pixel Fold's unfolded display provides more screen real estate for productivity.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the high refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)Tensor G2 is generally more powerful, especially in AI tasks, offering smoother performance and potentially better battery efficiency due to the smaller process node.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Pixel Fold has a more powerful CPU architecture, resulting in faster app loading, multitasking, and demanding game performance.
RAM8GB12GBPixel Fold's larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without reloading, improving multitasking performance.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 8MP Wide48MP Main, 10.8MP Wide, 10.8MP TelephotoPixel Fold's triple camera system offers greater versatility with a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom. Google's computational photography likely results in superior image quality.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fpsUp to 4K@60fps with HDRPixel Fold supports higher resolution and HDR video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004821Comparable battery capacities, but real-world battery life will depend on usage, especially with the Pixel Fold's larger inner display.
Fast Charging30W30WBoth offer similarly fast charging speeds. No information on wireless charging for either phone.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Lighter and More Pocketable: Easier to carry and handle for extended periods.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Simpler display technology and less demanding processor might lead to longer battery life with typical usage.

Google Pixel Fold Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a larger, tablet-like experience for multitasking and media consumption.
  • Superior Performance: More powerful processor and more RAM for smoother performance.
  • Better Camera System: More versatile camera setup with a telephoto lens and Google's advanced image processing.
  • Higher Quality Display: OLED technology offers better contrast, colors, and viewing angles.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G73: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability, battery life, and a lightweight design. Ideal for everyday tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and light gaming.

Google Pixel Fold: Users who value cutting-edge technology, a large screen for multitasking and media consumption, and a top-tier camera system. Suitable for power users, content creators, and those who want a device that can replace both a phone and a small tablet.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel Fold is significantly more expensive.
  2. How important is portability versus screen size? The G73 is more pocketable, while the Pixel Fold offers a larger unfolded screen.
  3. What are your primary use cases? The G73 is sufficient for basic tasks, while the Pixel Fold excels in multitasking, media consumption, and content creation.

My Choice: Google Pixel Fold

While the Motorola Moto G73 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Google Pixel Fold. The foldable design is a game-changer for me, providing the versatility of a tablet and a phone in one device. The superior performance, camera system, and OLED display further solidify my choice. I prioritize productivity and media consumption, and the Pixel Fold excels in those areas. While the price is significantly higher, the added functionality and premium experience justify the cost for my personal needs. The weight is a concern, but the benefits outweigh this drawback for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.