Motorola Moto G72 vs Xiaomi Redmi A2 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2022 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.34 cm³ 115.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.98 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 166 g 192 g
Height 160.5 mm 164.9 mm
Width 74.4 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White
  • Aqua Blue
  • Classic Black
  • Sea Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.1 % 81 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 400 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53 mAh/cm³ 43.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G72 and the Xiaomi Redmi A2, dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G72Xiaomi Redmi A2Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1Moto G72 is slightly smaller and significantly thinner. More pocketable and comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)166192Moto G72 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialPlasticPlasticSimilar build materials suggest comparable durability, though individual testing would confirm this.
Display
TypeP-OLEDIPS LCDMoto G72's OLED offers deeper blacks, richer colors, and potentially better battery efficiency due to pixel self-lighting.
Size6.6"6.52"Negligible size difference; both offer ample screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1600Moto G72 boasts significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution (Full HD+ vs. HD+).
Refresh Rate120Hz-Moto G72's higher refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall user experience.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G99 (6nm)Helio G36 (12nm)Moto G72's more advanced and power-efficient chipset translates to noticeably faster performance and better multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Moto G72's CPU architecture provides a significant performance advantage, especially in demanding tasks.
RAM6/8GB2/3GBMoto G72 offers more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of memory-intensive applications.
Camera
Main Camera108MP8MPMoto G72's higher resolution main camera promises significantly more detail and better low-light performance.
Front Camera16MP5MPMoto G72's selfie camera boasts higher resolution for sharper self-portraits.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, but real-world usage will depend on other factors like the display and chipset.
Chargingproprietary fast charging10WMoto G72 will likely charge faster.

2. Key Insights

The Moto G72 clearly positions itself as the more powerful and feature-rich device. Its advantages lie in a superior display (OLED with 120Hz refresh rate), a significantly faster processor (Helio G99), more RAM, and a higher resolution camera system. The overall user experience will be smoother, faster, and visually more appealing.

The Redmi A2, on the other hand, focuses on affordability. While it offers a large display and long-lasting battery, it compromises on performance, camera quality, and display resolution.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G72: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a smooth user experience, a vibrant display, and mobile photography. Gamers, content creators, and those who multitask heavily will appreciate its capabilities.

Redmi A2: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. It's a good option for those seeking a simple, reliable device without demanding high performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A2 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the Redmi A2 might suffice. For demanding tasks or gaming, the Moto G72 is necessary.
  3. How important are display quality and camera performance to you? The Moto G72 significantly outperforms the Redmi A2 in both areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a tight budget: Redmi A2
  • Casual user who prioritizes battery life: Potentially either, real world battery tests needed.
  • Mobile gamer or content creator: Moto G72
  • User who values a smooth and responsive user experience: Moto G72

My Choice: Motorola Moto G72

While the Redmi A2 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Motorola Moto G72. The significantly improved performance, superior display, and more capable camera system are worth the price difference for me. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, and the Moto G72's hardware ensures that. The 120Hz OLED display is a major draw, providing a visually immersive experience. While I appreciate the Redmi A2's budget-friendly approach, the compromises in performance and features would ultimately detract from my daily usage.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.