Motorola Moto G72 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.34 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.98 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 166 g 222 g
Height 160.5 mm 162.3 mm
Width 74.4 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.1 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G72 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison of the Motorola Moto G72 and the Samsung Galaxy M35, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G72Samsung Galaxy M35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1M35 slightly larger and thicker. G72 likely feels more sleek in hand.
Weight (g)166222G72 significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeP-OLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. AMOLED generally boasts deeper blacks.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness; imperceptible difference in daily use.
Size (inches)6.66.6Same screen real estate for media consumption and multitasking.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G99 (6nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)M35's 5nm process suggests better power efficiency and potentially higher performance.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreM35 likely boasts faster clock speeds and more powerful cores, leading to smoother multitasking.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G68 MP5M35 has a more powerful GPU, beneficial for gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM6/8GB8GBBoth offer sufficient RAM for most users, but M35's 8GB standard provides more headroom for future apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10850G72 boasts higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. M35 utilizes pixel binning.
Video Recording1080p@60fps4K@30fpsM35 capable of higher resolution video, but G72 may offer smoother slow-motion capture.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50006000M35 has a larger battery, potentially translating to longer usage time.
Other
OSAndroid 12Android 14M35 comes with a newer OS version, offering the latest features and security updates.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Galaxy M35, with its more advanced Exynos 1380 processor, promises a noticeably smoother and faster user experience, especially in demanding tasks and gaming. The G72, while capable, targets a more budget-conscious user.
  • Camera: While the Moto G72 flaunts a 108MP sensor, megapixels don't tell the whole story. The Samsung M35's 50MP sensor with pixel binning and optical image stabilization (OIS) potentially delivers better low-light performance and steadier videos. The M35 also offers 4K video recording.
  • Battery: The M35's larger 6000mAh battery likely provides significantly longer usage time between charges.
  • Software: The M35 benefits from a newer Android version, offering potential advantages in features, security, and long-term software support.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G72: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight design and a decent camera for everyday photography. Ideal for social media, casual gaming, and general use.
  • Samsung Galaxy M35: A better choice for users who demand higher performance for gaming or multitasking, value a longer-lasting battery, and prioritize the latest software features. Also a good choice for content creators who want 4K video recording.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The G72 generally comes at a lower price point.
  2. What are your performance needs? Heavy gamers and multitaskers will appreciate the M35's more powerful hardware.
  3. How important is battery life? If all-day usage is crucial, the M35's larger battery is a significant advantage.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Moto G72 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. The combination of a more powerful processor, a larger battery, superior camera features (OIS and 4K video), and a more current Android version makes it a more compelling overall package for my needs. I prioritize performance, future-proof software, and a camera capable of high-quality video capture, and the M35 delivers on these fronts. The slightly higher price and heavier weight are acceptable trade-offs for the significant gains in performance and features.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.