Motorola Moto G72 vs Samsung Galaxy A54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2022 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.34 cm³ 99.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.98 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 166 g 202 g
Height 160.5 mm 158.2 mm
Width 74.4 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.1 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 403 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53 mAh/cm³ 50.25 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G72 vs. Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G72 and the Samsung Galaxy A54, two compelling contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena. We'll dissect their specifications, translate them into real-world implications, and ultimately guide you toward the device that best aligns with your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G72Samsung Galaxy A54Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2A54 slightly shorter and wider, both slim; negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)166202G72 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
TypeP-OLEDSuper AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; A54 potentially brighter with HDR10+ support.
Size (inches)6.66.4G72 slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Similar pixel density; sharpness indistinguishable in everyday use.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G99Exynos 1380A54 boasts a more powerful processor, translating to faster app loading, multitasking, and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A54's CPU architecture and higher clock speeds deliver a significant performance advantage.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G68 MP5A54's GPU offers superior graphics processing for smoother gaming and demanding applications.
RAM (GB)6/88More RAM in A54 enables better multitasking and background app retention.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10850G72 higher megapixel count; A54 uses a larger sensor (Sony IMX766) likely resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range.
Video1080p@60fps4K@30fpsA54 capable of higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity; real-world usage will depend on software optimization and individual use patterns.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Samsung Galaxy A54 significantly outperforms the Moto G72 thanks to its more powerful Exynos 1380 processor and superior GPU. This translates to a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience, especially in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking.
  • Camera: While the Moto G72 boasts a higher megapixel count, the A54 leverages a larger, more advanced sensor (Sony IMX766), optical image stabilization (OIS), and superior video recording capabilities. This suggests the A54 will likely produce higher quality images, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
  • Display: Both phones offer excellent displays with vibrant colors and fast refresh rates. The A54's Super AMOLED panel with HDR10+ might offer slightly better brightness and dynamic range.
  • Design and Build: The Moto G72 is lighter, potentially making it more comfortable for extended use. The A54 feels more premium due to its slightly smaller bezels and more refined materials.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G72: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight phone with a large display for media consumption and casual gaming. Its clean Android experience and long battery life are also attractive features.
  • Samsung Galaxy A54: Ideal for users who demand a more powerful and versatile device with a focus on photography, mobile gaming, and overall performance. The longer software support commitment from Samsung is also a significant advantage.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Moto G72 generally comes at a lower price point, making it a more budget-friendly option.
  • What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks like gaming and heavy multitasking, the A54 is the clear winner.
  • How important is camera quality? If photography is a priority, the A54's superior camera system is likely worth the extra investment.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A54. While the Moto G72 offers excellent value for its price, I prioritize performance and camera quality. The A54's more powerful processor, advanced camera system with OIS, and longer software support make it a more compelling device for my needs. The slightly higher price is justified by the significant improvements in key areas. As someone who appreciates a smooth and responsive user experience and captures a lot of photos and videos, the A54 aligns better with my usage patterns.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.