Motorola Moto G72 vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2022 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.34 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.98 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 166 g 199 g
Height 160.5 mm 161.3 mm
Width 74.4 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.1 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G72 vs. Samsung Galaxy A34: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G72 and the Samsung Galaxy A34, two compelling contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena. We'll dissect their specifications, translate them into real-world implications, and ultimately help you decide which phone best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G72Samsung Galaxy A34Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2A34 slightly larger and heavier; G72 feels more compact in hand.
Weight (g)166199G72 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
TypeP-OLEDSuper AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; AMOLED generally has slightly better contrast.
Size6.6"6.6"Identical screen sizes provide ample viewing space for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually indistinguishable sharpness; minimal difference in pixel density.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and fluid animations, enhancing the overall user experience.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G99Dimensity 1080Dimensity 1080 boasts slightly better CPU and GPU performance, leading to smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming capabilities.
CPU2x2.2 GHz A76, 6x2.0 GHz A552x2.6 GHz A78, 6x2.0 GHz A55A34's faster prime cores provide a noticeable performance edge in demanding tasks.
RAM6/8GB6/8GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking; 8GB variant recommended for power users.
OSAndroid 12Android 13A34 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. Longer software support likely with the A34
Camera
Main108MP48MPG72 boasts higher resolution; A34 utilizes a Sony sensor known for good image quality, especially in low light. OIS on A34 is a huge plus
Ultrawide8MP8MPComparable ultrawide capabilities.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, though real-world usage will vary.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Galaxy A34, with its Dimensity 1080 chipset, holds a clear performance advantage. While the Helio G99 in the Moto G72 is no slouch, the A34 will handle demanding tasks and gaming with more grace.
  • Camera: The G72's 108MP main sensor might seem impressive on paper, but the A34's 48MP Sony sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is likely to deliver more consistent results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. OIS is a game changer for sharper images and smoother videos.
  • Software: The A34 ships with Android 13 and Samsung's commitment to longer software updates makes it a winner in this category.
  • Value: Pricing varies by region and storage configuration, but generally, these phones are closely priced. The A34 often presents a slightly better value proposition due to its superior performance, camera with OIS, and longer software support.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G72: Best suited for users who prioritize a lightweight phone with a vibrant display and solid battery life. Ideal for casual users who primarily use their phones for social media, browsing, and light gaming.
  • Samsung Galaxy A34: A more well-rounded device catering to users who demand better performance, a reliable camera with OIS, and the latest software features. Suitable for mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those who value future-proofing through software updates.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • Are you a heavy mobile gamer or multitasker? If yes, the Galaxy A34's superior performance will be crucial.
  • Is camera quality a top priority? The A34's OIS gives it a significant edge in producing stable and clear photos and videos.
  • How important are software updates and new features? The A34, running on Android 13 with a promise of longer updates, wins in this department.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A34. While the Moto G72 is a compelling option for its lightweight design, the A34's superior performance, more reliable camera system thanks to OIS, and longer software support make it a more future-proof and versatile device. As someone who appreciates a smooth user experience and values capturing high-quality photos and videos, the A34 aligns better with my needs. The promise of longer software updates also ensures I'll be able to enjoy new features and security patches for a longer period.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.