Motorola Moto G72 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.34 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.98 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 166 g 189 g
Height 160.5 mm 171.4 mm
Width 74.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.1 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G72 vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto G72 and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G72Motorola Razr 50 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9171.4 x 74 x 7.1Razr 50 Ultra is more compact when folded, but larger unfolded. G72 is thinner and lighter overall.
Weight (g)166189G72 is noticeably lighter for everyday carry.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 Ultra offers a compact folded size and a large inner screen for multitasking.
Display
TypeP-OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr 50 Ultra's foldable display allows for unique use cases and a larger screen in a pocketable device.
Size (inches)6.66.9Razr 50 Ultra boasts a larger main display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120165Razr 50 Ultra delivers smoother scrolling and animations.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2640Both offer sharp visuals, but Razr 50 Ultra is slightly sharper due to its larger size.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G99Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Razr 50 Ultra offers significantly faster processing and graphics performance for demanding tasks.
RAM (GB)6/812Razr 50 Ultra allows for seamless multitasking and smooth performance with demanding apps.
OSAndroid 12Android 14Razr 50 Ultra comes with a newer OS version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10850G72 has higher resolution, Razr has a larger sensor and advanced features like OIS.
Selfie Camera (MP)1632Razr 50 Ultra offers a higher-resolution selfie camera for sharper self-portraits.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50004000G72 has a significantly larger battery, potentially lasting longer on a single charge.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Razr 50 Ultra is a clear winner in performance, thanks to its flagship Snapdragon processor and ample RAM. The G72, while capable for everyday tasks, might struggle with more demanding applications and multitasking.
  • Display: While both phones have OLED displays with high refresh rates, the Razr's foldable LTPO panel with HDR10+ and Dolby Vision support provides a superior visual experience. The higher peak brightness also enhances outdoor visibility.
  • Camera: The G72 boasts a higher megapixel count on its main camera, but the Razr 50 Ultra likely delivers better overall image quality due to its larger sensor size, optical image stabilization (OIS), and advanced software features.
  • Battery Life: The G72's larger battery capacity suggests longer endurance, while the Razr 50 Ultra's smaller battery might require more frequent charging, especially with heavy usage of the large main display. The Razr 50 Ultra having a much more demanding processor will impact battery life as well.
  • Form Factor: The Razr 50 Ultra's foldable design is its defining feature. It offers a large screen when unfolded and a compact pocketable size when folded. However, this comes at a premium in terms of price and potential durability concerns.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G72: This phone is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and a reliable, straightforward smartphone experience. It's great for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography.
  • Razr 50 Ultra: This phone is perfect for tech enthusiasts and early adopters who want the latest technology and a unique foldable form factor. It excels in multitasking, media consumption, and mobile photography, thanks to its powerful hardware and stunning display.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more expensive than the G72.
  2. Do you value portability and a large screen? The Razr's foldable design offers both.
  3. What are your performance needs? The Razr 50 Ultra delivers flagship-level performance, while the G72 is suited for everyday tasks.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

While the Moto G72 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. The foldable form factor is incredibly appealing to me, offering a large screen for productivity and entertainment while remaining incredibly pocketable. I prioritize a smooth user experience and appreciate the power of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, ensuring seamless multitasking and handling of demanding applications. The advanced camera features and stunning display are compelling additions. While the battery life might be a concern, I'm willing to make that trade-off for the cutting-edge technology and unique design the Razr 50 Ultra offers. As a tech journalist who constantly uses my phone for capturing quick video, taking photos, browsing the internet, and everything in-between, I would appreciate the extra performance.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.