Motorola Moto G72 vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date October 3, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.34 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.98 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 166 g 188.4 g
Height 160.5 mm 171.3 mm
Width 74.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.1 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G72 and the Motorola Razr 50, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer users.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G72Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9171.3 x 74 x 7.3Razr 50 is taller and slightly thinner when unfolded, but significantly thicker when folded. G72 is lighter.
Weight (g)166188.4G72 is noticeably lighter for daily carry.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 offers compact portability when folded.
Display
TypeP-OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr 50 boasts a cutting-edge foldable display with potential for better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.66.9Razr 50 provides a larger screen area when unfolded.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2640Both offer sharp visuals, but Razr 50 is slightly taller.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both deliver smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak BrightnessN/A3000 nitsRazr 50 should offer superior outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G99 (6nm)Dimensity 7300X (4nm)Razr 50's newer, more efficient chipset will deliver significantly better performance and multitasking.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreRazr 50's CPU architecture is more powerful, resulting in faster app loading and smoother operation.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G615 MC2Razr 50 offers a stronger GPU, enhancing gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM6/8GB8/12GBRazr 50 offers more RAM in its higher-end configurations for improved multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10850G72 boasts higher resolution, but Razr 50's sensor and processing could potentially deliver better quality.
Selfie Camera (MP)1632Razr 50 offers a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50004200G72 has a larger battery capacity, suggesting potentially longer battery life.

2. Key Insights

The Moto G72 presents itself as a solid mid-range contender with a focus on battery life and a high-resolution main camera. The Razr 50, on the other hand, is a statement piece with its foldable design, cutting-edge display, and powerful performance.

The G72's Helio G99 chipset, while capable, pales in comparison to the Razr 50's Dimensity 7300X. This difference will be noticeable in demanding tasks, gaming, and overall responsiveness. The Razr 50's foldable screen, though stunning, comes with a trade-off in battery capacity. However, the more efficient chipset in the Razr 50 might offset this to some extent.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G72: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life, a good main camera, and reliable everyday performance. Students, casual users, and those seeking a simple, long-lasting phone will find the G72 appealing.

Motorola Razr 50: Designed for trendsetters and tech enthusiasts who crave the latest innovations. The foldable design, powerful performance, and vibrant display cater to users who value portability, style, and a premium mobile experience. Content creators who value a high-quality selfie camera would also find this phone appealing.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Ask:

  1. What's your budget? The G72 is significantly more affordable.
  2. Is a foldable design a priority? This is the defining feature of the Razr 50.
  3. What kind of performance do you need? The Razr 50 offers a substantial leap in processing power.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I'd go with the Motorola Razr 50. While the G72 is a solid phone for its price, the Razr 50 represents a significant step forward in mobile technology. The foldable form factor, combined with the powerful Dimensity 7300X chipset and bright, vibrant display, offers a truly unique and compelling user experience. As a tech journalist, I value being on the cutting edge of innovation, and the Razr 50 delivers that. While battery life is a concern with foldable phones, the efficiency of the new chipset and advancements in battery technology mitigate this somewhat. The premium feel and enhanced capabilities of the Razr 50 outweigh the battery capacity advantage and price difference of the G72 for my personal needs and preferences.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.