Motorola Moto G72 vs Google Pixel Fold - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 3, 2022 June 27, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.34 cm³ 128.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.98 "/g 2.69 "/g
Weight 166 g 283 g
Height 160.5 mm 139.7 mm
Width 74.4 mm 158.7 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 5.8 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 7.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1840 x 2208
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.1 % 82.7 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 378 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1450 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 83.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53 mAh/cm³ 37.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4821 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G710 MP7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G72 and the Google Pixel Fold, two phones occupying different tiers in the Android ecosystem.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G72Google Pixel FoldReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8Pixel Fold significantly wider due to folding design; Moto G72 thinner and lighter for easier one-handed use
Weight (g)166283Pixel Fold's weight reflects its complex hinge and larger display; Moto G72 more pocketable
FoldableNoYesPixel Fold offers tablet-like experience when unfolded; Moto G72 traditional smartphone form factor
Display
Size (inches)6.67.6 (unfolded) 5.8 (folded)Pixel Fold provides significantly larger screen real estate when unfolded; smaller external display
TypeP-OLEDFoldable OLEDPixel Fold's folding display introduces durability concerns; Moto G72's P-OLED offers vibrant colors
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001840 x 2208 (unfolded) 1080 x 2092 (folded)Pixel Fold sharper when unfolded; comparable to Moto G72 when folded
Performance
ChipsetHelio G99Google Tensor G2Tensor G2 significantly more powerful, enabling superior multitasking and AI capabilities; G99 decent for everyday tasks
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz X1 & 2x2.35 GHz A78 & 4x1.80 GHz A55)Tensor G2 offers faster processing speeds and improved efficiency
RAM (GB)812Pixel Fold's larger RAM handles demanding applications and multitasking with ease
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10848Moto G72 boasts higher megapixel count; Pixel Fold relies on Google's computational photography prowess
Video1080p@60fps4K@60fpsPixel Fold captures higher resolution video with HDR
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50004821Moto G72 likely offers longer battery life due to lower power consumption and larger battery

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Pixel Fold, powered by the Tensor G2, significantly outperforms the Moto G72 in processing power and AI capabilities. The Moto G72's Helio G99 is sufficient for everyday tasks, but the Pixel Fold handles demanding applications and multitasking more effectively.
  • Display: The Pixel Fold's foldable OLED offers a unique, expansive experience when unfolded, transforming into a tablet-sized screen. However, the Moto G72's traditional P-OLED provides vibrant colors and a more pocketable form factor.
  • Camera: While the Moto G72 boasts a higher megapixel count, the Pixel Fold leverages Google's advanced computational photography algorithms to potentially deliver superior image quality. The Pixel Fold also offers superior video recording capabilities.
  • Battery: The Moto G72, with its larger 5000mAh battery and less demanding hardware, likely provides longer battery life compared to the Pixel Fold.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G72: Ideal for budget-conscious users seeking a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Its long battery life is a significant advantage.
  • Pixel Fold: Best suited for power users and early adopters who value innovation and a unique user experience. The foldable design enables multitasking and content consumption on a larger scale, but comes at a premium price.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G72 is significantly more affordable than the Pixel Fold.
  2. Do you prioritize performance or battery life? The Pixel Fold offers superior performance, while the Moto G72 likely provides longer battery life.
  3. Is a foldable screen a must-have feature? The Pixel Fold's unique form factor offers a tablet-like experience, while the Moto G72 provides a more traditional smartphone experience.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who values cutting-edge technology and the flexibility of a larger screen for productivity, I would choose the Pixel Fold. While the price is significantly higher and battery life might be a concern, the innovative foldable design, superior performance powered by the Tensor G2, and advanced camera capabilities outweigh the drawbacks for my specific needs. The ability to seamlessly transition from a phone to a mini-tablet for tasks like editing documents, watching videos, and multitasking is a compelling proposition. I'm willing to compromise on battery life for the unique user experience and raw power the Pixel Fold offers.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.