Motorola Moto G54 vs Xiaomi 13T - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 13T
Xiaomi 13T
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date September 5, 2023 September 26, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.41 cm³ 104.37 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 177 g 193 g
Height 161.6 mm 162.2 mm
Width 73.8 mm 75.7 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green
  • Black
  • Meadow Green
  • Alpine Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.41 mAh/cm³ 47.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G54Xiaomi 13TPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.6 x 73.8 x 8mm162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5mmXiaomi 13T is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight177g193gMoto G54 is noticeably lighter, improving one-hand usage.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based; under-display perceived as more modern.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+Xiaomi 13T offers superior contrast, wider color gamut, and higher peak brightness, resulting in a significantly better viewing experience, especially outdoors.
Size6.5"6.67"Xiaomi 13T offers a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1080x24001220x2712Xiaomi 13T has a sharper display due to higher resolution and pixel density.
Refresh Rate120Hz144HzWhile both offer smooth scrolling, the 144Hz on the Xiaomi 13T might be noticeable in fast-paced gaming.
Peak BrightnessNot specified2600 nitsMissing peak brightness for Moto G54 makes outdoor visibility comparison difficult; Xiaomi's 2600 nits ensures excellent sunlight readability.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm)Xiaomi 13T's 8200 Ultra, built on a smaller node, will offer significantly better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Xiaomi 13T's CPU has a higher clock speed and more powerful cores, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G610 MC6Xiaomi 13T's GPU is more powerful, offering a better gaming and graphics-intensive task experience.
RAM8GB12GBXiaomi 13T offers more RAM for better multitasking and app switching.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer the same storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps (HDR, EIS), 1080p@30/60/120fps (HDR, EIS)Xiaomi 13T boasts significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rates, and HDR/EIS support.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, but real-world battery life will depend on optimization and display efficiency. Xiaomi's more powerful processor might consume more power.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: More comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.
  • Potentially more affordable: While both are mid-range, the Moto G54 might be priced lower.

Xiaomi 13T Advantages:

  • Significantly better display: Superior brightness, contrast, color accuracy, and refresh rate.
  • Much more powerful performance: Smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness.
  • Superior video recording: Higher resolution, frame rates, and stabilization.
  • More RAM: Enables better multitasking and future-proofing.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G54:

  • Budget-conscious users: Prioritizing affordability and basic functionality.
  • Users seeking a lightweight phone: Valuing comfort and portability.

Xiaomi 13T:

  • Power users: Demanding high performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Multimedia enthusiasts: Prioritizing a high-quality display and video recording capabilities.
  • Users who value future-proofing: The more powerful hardware offers better longevity.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G54 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming, multimedia consumption, or basic communication?
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Xiaomi 13T excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, basic usage: Moto G54
  • Balanced budget, demanding usage: Xiaomi 13T

My Choice: Xiaomi 13T

While the Moto G54 offers a lighter and potentially more affordable option, the Xiaomi 13T's superior display, significantly better performance, enhanced video recording capabilities, and larger RAM make it a clear winner for me. The difference in weight is minor compared to the significant gains in user experience offered by the 13T. The improved performance and RAM also ensure better longevity. I prioritize a smooth and enjoyable user experience, making the 13T the more compelling choice despite the potential price difference. The brighter display is crucial for outdoor use, a significant factor in my personal usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.