Motorola Moto G54 vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 5, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.41 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 177 g 197 g
Height 161.6 mm 161 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.41 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G54Samsung Galaxy A25Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.6 x 73.8 x 8mm161 x 76.5 x 8.3mmThe Moto G54 is slightly thinner and narrower, potentially offering a better one-hand grip.
Weight177g197gThe Moto G54 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM)The A25's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better outdoor visibility due to higher brightness. The G54 has a smoother scrolling experience with a 120Hz refresh rate.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Negligible real-world difference in sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 7020 (6nm)Exynos 1280 (5nm)The Exynos 1280 (5nm) is likely more power efficient, but performance differences will depend on specific tasks and optimization.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The A25's slightly higher clock speed on the performance cores might provide a minor advantage in demanding tasks.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G68Performance differences will depend on specific game optimization; difficult to definitively say which is better without benchmarks.
RAM8GB8GBSame RAM capacity, meaning similar multitasking capabilities.
Storage256GB256GBIdentical storage capacity.
OSAndroid 13Android 14The A25 launches with a newer Android version and has longer guaranteed OS updates (up to Android 18).
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity; actual battery life will depend on usage and software optimization.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30fps (EIS)The A25 can record in 4K resolution, offering higher detail. Both phones feature Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother videos.
Other
Sensorsaccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, Fingerprint (side-mounted)accelerometer, gyro, compass, Fingerprint (side-mounted)Both phones have a similar sensor suite. The Moto G54 lists a proximity sensor, while its absence isn't explicitly stated for the A25.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Slightly More Compact: More comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
  • Potentially Smoother Scrolling: Though not quantifiable without testing, some IPS LCD panels at 120Hz can feel smoother than some AMOLED panels at 120Hz due to response time differences.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology offers richer colors and deeper blacks. Higher brightness improves outdoor visibility.
  • 4K Video Recording: Captures more detailed videos.
  • Newer OS and Longer Software Support: Ships with Android 14 and guaranteed updates to Android 18, ensuring security and feature updates for longer.
  • Potentially More Power Efficient: The 5nm Exynos chip might offer better battery life compared to the 6nm Dimensity chip.

Trade-offs:

  • The A25's superior display and video recording come at the cost of increased weight.
  • The G54's potential smoothness and lighter weight might sacrifice battery life and advanced camera features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G54 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users prioritizing a lightweight and comfortable phone.
  • Users who value smooth scrolling and responsiveness.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Ideal User:

  • Users prioritizing display quality and vibrant colors.
  • Users who want to record high-quality 4K videos.
  • Users who value long-term software updates and security.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display quality and brightness? If vibrant colors and excellent outdoor visibility are crucial, the A25 is the better choice.
  2. Do you frequently record videos? If 4K video recording is essential, the A25 is the only option.
  3. How much do you value software updates? If long-term software support is a priority, the A25 with its guaranteed updates to Android 18 is the winner.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A25

While the Moto G54 offers a lighter and potentially smoother experience, the Samsung Galaxy A25's superior AMOLED display, 4K video recording, newer Android version with longer update support, and potentially better power efficiency make it a more compelling overall package for me. The extra weight is a minor trade-off for these significant advantages. In the long run, the software updates and AMOLED screen will provide a better user experience. I also value the ability to record in 4K.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.