Motorola Moto G54 vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 5, 2023 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.41 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 177 g 182 g
Height 161.6 mm 162.4 mm
Width 73.8 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.41 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G54Oppo Reno11Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.6 x 73.8 x 8 mm162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mmVirtually identical in size; negligible real-world difference.
Weight177g182gThe Moto G54 is slightly lighter, but the difference (5g) is unlikely to be noticeable.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPersonal preference; both are reliable unlocking methods. Under-display is often perceived as more modern.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak)The Reno11's AMOLED offers significantly better contrast, richer colors (1B vs. 16M implied for IPS), and higher brightness, resulting in a superior viewing experience, especially outdoors. HDR10+ support further enhances visual quality for compatible content.
Size6.5"6.7"The Reno11 provides a slightly larger viewing area.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Negligible difference in sharpness.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak BrightnessNot specified950 nitsThe Reno11's much higher peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. The lack of this spec for the Moto G54 makes a direct comparison impossible but suggests inferior performance in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)The Dimensity 7050 in the Reno11 offers a slightly higher clock speed on its performance cores (2.6 GHz vs. 2.2 GHz), potentially resulting in slightly faster performance in demanding tasks. The real-world difference is likely to be minimal for average users.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)See above.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G68 MC4Difficult to compare directly without benchmarks. Both are capable GPUs for mid-range phones, but specific gaming performance may vary.
RAM8GB12GBThe Reno11's 12GB RAM enables better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Storage256GB256GBIdentical storage capacity.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on factors like display usage and software optimization.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fpsThe Reno11 offers significantly more versatile video recording options, including 4K resolution and higher frame rates for slow-motion capture.
Other Camera SpecsNot provided for either phoneNot provided for either phoneCannot compare camera quality without more details on sensors, lens aperture, and software features.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Potentially slightly lower price (unconfirmed).
  • Slightly lighter.

Oppo Reno11 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with HDR10+, higher brightness, and richer colors.
  • More RAM: 12GB for smoother multitasking.
  • More Versatile Video Recording: 4K resolution and various slow-motion options.
  • Slightly Faster CPU: Potentially improved performance in demanding tasks.

Trade-offs:

  • The Reno11 might be slightly more expensive.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G54: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality and a smooth display over vibrant colors and high brightness. Suitable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual gaming.

Oppo Reno11: Users who value a premium visual experience, smoother multitasking, and versatile video recording capabilities. Ideal for content consumption, mobile gaming, and capturing high-quality videos.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Reno11 is likely to be more expensive.
  2. How important is display quality? The Reno11's AMOLED display is a significant upgrade.
  3. What are your primary use cases? Consider video recording needs and multitasking demands.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Moto G54
  • Prioritize Display Quality: Oppo Reno11
  • Heavy Multitasker/Gamer: Oppo Reno11
  • Content Creator (Video): Oppo Reno11

My Choice: Oppo Reno11

The Oppo Reno11 is the clear winner for me. The superior AMOLED display with HDR10+ and high brightness is a major deciding factor. The extra RAM (12GB vs 8GB) ensures smoother performance in the long run, and the versatile video recording capabilities are a significant advantage. While the Moto G54 might be slightly cheaper, the Reno11 offers a noticeably better overall user experience, making it worth the potential price difference. The lack of detailed camera specifications for both phones prevents a complete assessment, but the Reno11's clear advantage in video recording capabilities suggests a stronger overall camera system.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.