Motorola Moto G54 vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 5, 2023 September 22, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.41 cm³ 101.79 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.03 "/g
Weight 177 g 221 g
Height 161.6 mm 159.9 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Blue Titanium
  • Natural Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1290 x 2796
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.5 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 98.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.41 mAh/cm³ 43.63 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4441 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) Apple A17 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz)
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 13 17
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G54Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.6 x 73.8 x 8 mm159.9 x 76.7 x 8.3 mmVirtually identical in hand feel.
Weight177g221giPhone significantly heavier, potentially noticeable during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedTitanium frameDurability and premium feel advantage for iPhone. Missing Moto G54 info limits comparison.
Display
Size6.5"6.7"iPhone offers a slightly larger viewing area.
TypeIPS LCD, 120HzLTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120HziPhone's OLED provides significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and HDR support.
Resolution1080 x 24001290 x 2796Sharper image on the iPhone due to higher pixel density (460 vs 405 ppi).
BrightnessNot specified1000 nits (typical), 2000 nits (peak)iPhone will be significantly more visible in sunlight. Missing Moto G54 brightness data limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)Apple A17 Pro (3 nm)A17 Pro expected to deliver significantly faster performance and better efficiency due to advanced manufacturing process and architecture.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Hexa-core (2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz)A17 Pro boasts higher clock speeds suggesting superior processing power.
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Apple GPU (6-core)Apple's custom GPU is likely to offer significantly better graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM8GB8GBComparable RAM, though performance will differ significantly due to chipset and software optimization.
Storage256GB512GB, 1TBiPhone offers larger storage options.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30/60fpsUp to 4K@60fps (HDR), 1080p@240fps (HDR)iPhone offers significantly better video recording capabilities including higher resolution, frame rates, and HDR. More comprehensive Moto G54 camera specs needed for detailed comparison.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4441 mAhMoto G54 has larger battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on numerous factors including software optimization and display efficiency.
Software
OSAndroid 13iOS 17Different operating systems cater to different user preferences and ecosystems.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life: Larger battery capacity suggests potentially longer usage between charges.
  • Lower price: "Medium price" suggests significantly more affordable than the iPhone.

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Advantages:

  • Significantly higher performance: A17 Pro chip provides superior processing and graphics power for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: OLED technology delivers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher brightness.
  • Premium build quality: Titanium frame enhances durability and provides a more premium feel.
  • Advanced camera features: Offers higher resolution video recording with HDR and higher frame rates.
  • Faster charging and data transfer: USB 3.2 Gen 2 provides significant speed improvements.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G54 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users prioritizing affordability.
  • Users who value long battery life.
  • Users preferring the Android ecosystem.

iPhone 15 Pro Max Ideal User:

  • Users prioritizing performance and premium experience.
  • Mobile gamers and content creators demanding high processing power and display quality.
  • Users heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The iPhone 15 Pro Max commands a significantly higher price.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the iPhone is vastly superior.
  3. Which operating system do you prefer? Android and iOS offer distinct user experiences and app ecosystems.

My Choice: Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

While the Moto G54 offers a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious buyers, the iPhone 15 Pro Max is the superior device overall. Its significantly faster performance, stunning display, premium build quality, and advanced camera capabilities outweigh the price difference for me. The A17 Pro chip future-proofs the device for demanding applications and games for years to come. While battery life is a concern, the superior efficiency of the A17 Pro might offset the smaller battery capacity compared to the Moto G54. Ultimately, I prioritize a smooth, powerful, and premium user experience, which the iPhone 15 Pro Max clearly delivers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.