Motorola Moto G53 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 15, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 183 g 189 g
Height 162.7 mm 171.4 mm
Width 74.7 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Arctic Silver
  • Pale Pink
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G53 vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G53 and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, two phones occupying different niches within Motorola's lineup. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to understand what these numbers mean for you, the user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G53Motorola Razr 50 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2171.4 x 74 x 7.1Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more compact when folded, making it incredibly pocketable despite its larger unfolded size.
Weight (g)183189Negligible difference in weight; both are comfortable for daily use.
FoldableNoYesRazr offers a unique form factor, transforming from a compact device to a full-sized smartphone.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.9Razr offers a more immersive viewing experience when unfolded.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2640Razr boasts much sharper visuals due to its higher resolution and pixel density.
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+Razr's AMOLED delivers superior contrast, vibrant colors, and smoother animations thanks to the higher refresh rate and LTPO.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 8s Gen 3Razr significantly outperforms the G53 in demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking due to its flagship-level processor.
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz)Octa-core (3.0 GHz)Razr's higher clock speeds translate to faster app launches, smoother performance, and better responsiveness.
RAM (GB)4/6/812Razr's ample RAM allows for seamless multitasking and effortless switching between apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050While both have 50MP sensors, the Razr likely utilizes a superior sensor and image processing for better image quality.
Selfie Camera (MP)832Razr offers a much higher resolution selfie camera for sharper and more detailed self-portraits.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50004000G53's larger battery likely provides longer battery life, while the Razr's power-hungry display and processor consume more power.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Razr 50 Ultra is a clear winner in terms of performance, thanks to its flagship Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor and ample RAM. The G53, with its Snapdragon 480+, is geared towards everyday tasks and lighter usage.
  • Display: The Razr's foldable AMOLED display offers a stunning visual experience with vibrant colors, deep blacks, and a high refresh rate. The G53's LCD panel is functional but lacks the vibrancy and smoothness of the Razr.
  • Form Factor: The Razr's unique folding design makes it incredibly compact when closed, fitting easily into pockets. The G53 is a more traditional slab-style phone.
  • Battery: While the G53 has a larger battery capacity, the Razr's more demanding hardware might result in comparable real-world battery life.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G53: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and reliable performance for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and communication.
  • Razr 50 Ultra: Perfect for users who value cutting-edge technology, a unique form factor, and top-tier performance for demanding tasks, gaming, and multimedia consumption. The foldable design is a statement piece.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The G53 is significantly more affordable than the Razr 50 Ultra.
  2. What level of performance do you need? For basic tasks, the G53 suffices. For demanding applications and gaming, the Razr is the better choice.
  3. How important is portability and a unique design? The Razr's foldable design offers unparalleled portability and a futuristic aesthetic.

My Choice: The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

While the Moto G53 represents excellent value, I would choose the Razr 50 Ultra. The foldable form factor is genuinely innovative, solving the age-old problem of large screen sizes hindering pocketability. As a tech enthusiast, I appreciate pushing boundaries, and the Razr embodies that. The powerful processor, stunning display, and unique design outweigh the battery life trade-off and higher price for my personal needs. I'm willing to sacrifice some battery life for the sheer innovation and powerful performance the Razr 50 Ultra offers. It's a device that sparks conversation and delivers a premium mobile experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.