Motorola Moto G52 vs Xiaomi Poco C40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 June 17, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 119.52 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 169 g 204 g
Height 160.1 mm 169.6 mm
Width 74.5 mm 76.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 82 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 400 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 133.26 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 50.2 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) JLQ JR510 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MC1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 11
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G52 vs. Xiaomi Poco C40: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison of the Moto G52 and Poco C40, focusing on how their features translate into real-world experiences.

1. The Visual Story: Display and Design

Imagine holding the Moto G52 – its sleek, lightweight design (169g) feels comfortable in your hand. The 6.6" AMOLED screen bursts with vibrant colors and deep blacks, thanks to the superior display technology. Scrolling through social media feels fluid with the 90Hz refresh rate. Now, picture the Poco C40. It's noticeably larger and heavier (204g), with a 6.71" IPS LCD screen. While the size might appeal to some, the lower resolution (720x1650) and 60Hz refresh rate result in a less sharp and smooth visual experience.

User Experience Impact: The G52 provides a more premium and immersive visual experience, while the C40 prioritizes screen size over visual quality.

2. Performance in Action: Everyday Tasks and Beyond

Think of opening multiple apps, browsing the web, and playing a casual game. The G52, powered by the Snapdragon 680 processor and boasting a significantly higher Antutu benchmark score (216,000 vs 128,944), handles these tasks with ease. The Poco C40, with its JLQ JR510 processor, might struggle with more demanding applications or heavy multitasking.

User Experience Impact: The G52 offers a smoother, more responsive performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, while the C40 might experience occasional lag.

3. Powering Through the Day: Battery Life and Charging

Imagine being out and about all day. The Poco C40, with its massive 6000mAh battery, offers the potential for extended use without needing a recharge. However, the 18W charging speed means topping it up takes longer. The G52, while having a smaller 5000mAh battery, boasts faster 30W charging, getting you back to full power quicker. The C40 also offers reverse charging, allowing you to power other devices in a pinch - a feature absent in the G52.

User Experience Impact: The C40 excels in potential battery longevity, but the G52 offers the convenience of faster charging. The C40's reverse charging capability adds a unique sharing element.

4. Capturing Moments: Camera Capabilities

Imagine capturing a stunning sunset. The G52's 50MP main camera captures significantly more detail compared to the C40's 13MP sensor. The G52 also boasts a wide-angle lens for expansive landscape shots and a macro lens for detailed close-ups, features missing on the C40. While the C40 does offer a dedicated portrait mode with a depth sensor, the overall image quality is likely to be surpassed by the G52.

User Experience Impact: The G52 provides a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience for various photography scenarios.

Design-Centric Decision Framework:

FeatureMotorola Moto G52Xiaomi Poco C40User Experience Impact
DisplayAMOLED, 90HzIPS LCD, 60HzG52: More vibrant, smoother visuals
PerformanceSnapdragon 680JLQ JR510G52: Smoother multitasking, better gaming performance
Battery5000mAh, 30W6000mAh, 18WC40: Longer battery life, G52: Faster charging, C40: Reverse Charging
Camera50MP, Wide, Macro13MP, PortraitG52: Superior image quality, more versatile camera system
DesignLighter, SleekerLarger, HeavierG52: More comfortable for one-handed use

My Choice: The Motorola Moto G52

While the Poco C40 boasts a larger battery and reverse charging, the Moto G52 provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, smoother performance, faster charging, and more versatile camera system make it a more compelling choice for most users. The G52’s lighter weight and sleeker design also contribute to a more enjoyable handling experience. In my view, the G52 offers a more well-rounded and satisfying blend of form and function. It prioritizes the aspects of the mobile experience that truly enhance daily interaction, making technology more accessible and enjoyable.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.