Motorola Moto G52 vs Tecno Spark Go 2023 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 January 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 110.13 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g N/A
Weight 169 g 0 g
Height 160.1 mm 163.9 mm
Width 74.5 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • Nebula Purple
  • Endless Black
  • Uyuni Blue
  • Skin Orange

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 85 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 45.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU Adreno 610 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G52 vs. Tecno Spark Go 2023: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G52 and Tecno Spark Go 2023, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs. We'll use a narrative approach to understand how these devices fit into your daily life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMotorola Moto G52Tecno Spark Go 2023User Experience Impact
Interface DesignClean, modern Android 12 interfaceAndroid 12, potentially with custom skinMoto G52 likely offers a more familiar Android experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz refresh rate - smooth transitions60Hz refresh rate - standard transitionsMoto G52 provides a more fluid and responsive feel.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsStandard Android accessibility optionsBoth devices likely offer similar basic accessibility features.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer and lighter (169g vs. unknown)Larger and potentially heavierMoto G52 is likely more comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods.
Display QualityAMOLED - Vibrant, deep blacksIPS LCD - Decent color reproductionThe Moto G52's AMOLED screen offers a significantly richer visual experience.
PerformanceSnapdragon 680 - Smooth performanceHelio A22 - Basic performanceThe Moto G52 offers significantly better performance for multitasking and demanding apps.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're scrolling through your social media feed. On the Moto G52, the 90Hz AMOLED screen makes the experience feel incredibly smooth and visually engaging. Colors pop, and scrolling feels effortless. On the Spark Go 2023, while the larger screen provides ample viewing space, the 60Hz refresh rate and IPS LCD might result in a less fluid and visually impactful experience.

Scenario: You're trying to capture a quick photo of a beautiful sunset. The Moto G52's 50MP camera with a wider aperture (f/1.8) allows you to capture more detail and light, resulting in a stunning shot. The Spark Go 2023's 13MP camera might struggle in low-light conditions and produce less detailed images.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality. However, the Moto G52 offers a more premium experience for users who value a smooth display, better camera quality, and faster performance. Users with less demanding needs might find the Spark Go 2023 sufficient for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and browsing.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Moto G52 demonstrates a design philosophy focused on providing a well-rounded user experience. It prioritizes display quality, performance, and ergonomics. The Spark Go 2023, on the other hand, seems to focus on affordability and basic functionality.

My Choice:

I would choose the Motorola Moto G52. While potentially more expensive, it provides a significantly enhanced user experience. The beautiful AMOLED display, smoother performance thanks to the Snapdragon 680 and 90Hz refresh rate, superior camera system, and more comfortable ergonomics outweigh the price difference for me. It's a device designed with the user in mind, offering a more enjoyable and engaging interaction with technology. The Spark Go 2023 might be a suitable option for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, but it compromises significantly on the overall user experience. I believe technology should delight and empower, and the Moto G52 delivers on that promise.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.