Motorola Moto G52 vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 94.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.7 "/g
Weight 169 g 181 g
Height 160.1 mm 163.7 mm
Width 74.5 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 87 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 52.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Motorola Moto G52 and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. Instead of getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll explore how these devices translate technical features into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMotorola Moto G52Samsung Galaxy A73 5GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock AndroidOne UIOne UI offers more customization options, but Stock Android provides a cleaner, potentially faster experience. Impact depends on user preference for customization vs. simplicity.
Interaction Flow90Hz Refresh Rate120Hz Refresh RateThe A73's higher refresh rate results in noticeably smoother scrolling and animations, creating a more fluid and premium feel.
AccessibilitySide-mounted fingerprint sensorIn-display fingerprint sensorSide-mounted sensors are often easier to reach and more reliable. The A73's in-display sensor may be more aesthetically pleasing but potentially less reliable.
ErgonomicsLighter (169g)Heavier (181g)The G52's lighter weight enhances comfort during extended use, reducing hand fatigue.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a busy professional, Sarah, who relies on her phone for everything from conference calls to capturing quick snapshots of her kids. The A73's superior camera system, with its 108MP main lens and optical image stabilization, allows Sarah to capture crisp, detailed photos and videos even in challenging lighting conditions. Meanwhile, John, a college student on a budget, appreciates the G52's faster charging because he can quickly top up his battery between classes. The G52's cleaner Android experience might also appeal to John's desire for a simple, bloatware-free phone.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For users who prioritize visual clarity and smooth interactions, the A73's 120Hz AMOLED display is a game-changer. However, for those with smaller hands or who prioritize comfort, the G52's lighter weight and more ergonomic design might be preferable. Budget-conscious users might find the G52's lower price point more appealing without sacrificing essential features like a vibrant display and long battery life.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The G52 prioritizes practicality and affordability. It offers a clean Android experience, comfortable ergonomics, and fast charging. The A73 focuses on performance and premium features like a high-refresh-rate display and a powerful camera system.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

While the Moto G52 is a compelling option for budget-conscious users, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. The significantly faster processor, smoother 120Hz display, and superior camera system with OIS create a more engaging and enjoyable user experience. These features, in my opinion, outweigh the slight difference in weight and the benefits of stock Android. The A73's performance advantages would enhance my productivity and allow me to capture higher-quality photos and videos, enriching my daily interactions with the device. Although I appreciate the clean design of stock Android, I believe the overall user experience offered by the A73, powered by the Snapdragon 778G and its enhanced feature set, would better suit my needs.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.