Motorola Moto G52 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 169 g 213 g
Height 160.1 mm 161.1 mm
Width 74.5 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G52 vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's embark on a journey beyond the raw numbers and explore the distinct personalities of the Motorola Moto G52 and the Samsung Galaxy A55. We'll uncover how their design choices translate into tangible user experiences, empowering you to choose the device that truly resonates with your needs.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMotorola Moto G52Samsung Galaxy A55User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android experience, known for simplicitySamsung One UI, feature-rich and customizableOne UI offers more personalization options but can feel overwhelming for some users. Stock Android provides a clean, minimalist experience.
Interaction FlowSmooth, thanks to the 90Hz AMOLED displayMore fluid due to the 120Hz AMOLED displayThe higher refresh rate on the A55 results in noticeably smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the visual experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsSamsung's extensive suite of accessibility featuresThe A55 caters to a broader range of user needs with enhanced accessibility options.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (169g) and slightly smallerHeavier (213g) and slightly largerThe G52 provides a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a budding photographer capturing the vibrant energy of a street festival. The G52's lighter weight allows for effortless maneuverability, letting you capture fleeting moments without fatigue. However, the A55's superior camera system, with its larger sensor and advanced features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), empowers you to capture stunningly detailed photos and videos, even in challenging lighting conditions. Its 4K video recording capabilities allow you to preserve the festival's atmosphere in rich detail.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User Persona 1: A senior citizen prioritizing simplicity and ease of use. The G52's lighter weight, cleaner interface, and straightforward functionality make it a more accessible option.

User Persona 2: A young content creator seeking powerful performance and advanced camera features. The A55's robust processor, higher refresh rate display, and superior camera system cater to their creative ambitions.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Prioritize Simplicity and Comfort: Choose the Moto G52 for its lightweight design, clean interface, and comfortable handling.

Prioritize Performance and Cutting-Edge Features: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A55 for its powerful processor, stunning camera, and smoother display.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Moto G52 offers a compelling blend of simplicity and functionality, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A55. Its significantly more powerful processor, superior camera system with larger sensors and 4K video recording, and smoother 120Hz display create a richer, more immersive user experience. The added weight is a minor trade-off for the substantial performance and feature upgrades. As a technology communicator, I am drawn to devices that push the boundaries of innovation and offer users a glimpse into the future of mobile technology. The A55's advanced features and robust performance align perfectly with this perspective. While acknowledging the value of simplicity for certain user groups, I believe the A55's capabilities empower users to explore their creative potential and engage with technology in more meaningful ways.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.