Motorola Moto G52 vs Samsung Galaxy A54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 99.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 169 g 202 g
Height 160.1 mm 158.2 mm
Width 74.5 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 403 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 50.25 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G52 vs. Samsung Galaxy A54: A User-Centered Perspective

Let's move beyond the numbers and delve into the real-world experience of using the Motorola Moto G52 and the Samsung Galaxy A54. My analysis prioritizes how design choices translate into tangible user benefits, focusing on the narrative of interaction rather than just raw specifications.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMoto G52Samsung A54User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android, clean aestheticsOne UI, customizable but potentially bloatedG52 offers a purer Android experience; A54 provides more personalization options.
Interaction FlowSmooth, but limited by 90Hz refresh rateMore fluid due to 120Hz refresh rateA54's higher refresh rate results in a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresOne UI enhanced accessibility optionsA54 likely offers a wider range of accessibility features for users with diverse needs.
ErgonomicsLighter (169g), potentially more comfortableHeavier (202g), may feel bulkyG52's lighter weight could be crucial for users who prioritize comfort during extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who relies on their phone for everything from emails and video conferences to capturing quick moments throughout the day.

  • G52 Story: This user appreciates the G52's clean Android interface and lightweight design. It's a reliable workhorse for everyday tasks. However, they might notice the slightly less fluid scrolling and transitions compared to the A54.
  • A54 Story: This user is captivated by the A54's vibrant display and smooth performance. The enhanced camera features, especially the improved low-light capabilities and video stabilization, allow them to capture professional-quality photos and videos effortlessly. The added weight might be a slight trade-off for the superior performance.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For the Tech-Savvy User: The A54's powerful processor and advanced camera system provide a more compelling experience.
  • For the Casual User: The G52's simplicity and lighter weight might be preferred. Its clean Android interface is easier to navigate, and the battery life is comparable.
  • For Users with Accessibility Needs: While both devices offer standard accessibility features, the A54's One UI potentially provides more comprehensive options. Further research into specific accessibility requirements is recommended.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between these devices boils down to prioritizing performance versus simplicity and comfort. The A54 excels in delivering a premium user experience with its smooth display, powerful processor, and advanced camera. The G52 offers a more streamlined and lightweight option without compromising essential functionality.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A54

While the Moto G52 offers a compelling blend of simplicity and affordability, the Samsung Galaxy A54 resonates more with my user-centered approach. The smoother 120Hz display significantly enhances daily interactions, making everything from scrolling through social media to playing games feel more fluid and responsive. The superior camera system, validated by its impressive DxOMark score, empowers users to capture high-quality photos and videos with ease. While the added weight is a consideration, the overall performance and feature set of the A54 ultimately deliver a more enriching and engaging user experience. The investment in the A54 translates to a tangible improvement in daily usability and creative potential, aligning with my philosophy of prioritizing technology that seamlessly integrates into and enhances people's lives.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.