Motorola Moto G52 vs Samsung Galaxy A15 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 103.28 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.25 "/g
Weight 169 g 200 g
Height 160.1 mm 160.1 mm
Width 74.5 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Magical Blue
  • Personality Yellow

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 84.3 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 48.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Motorola Moto G52 and the Samsung Galaxy A15, moving beyond mere specs to uncover the stories these devices tell about the user experience.

Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureMoto G52Samsung Galaxy A15User Experience Impact
Interface DesignClean, stock Android experienceSamsung One UI overlayMoto G52 offers a potentially smoother, bloatware-free experience. Samsung's One UI adds customization but might feel overwhelming to some.
Interaction FlowEmphasis on simplicity and speedFeature-rich, potentially steeper learning curveMoto G52 likely feels more intuitive for novice users. Galaxy A15 offers more advanced features but requires exploration.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresOne UI accessibility featuresBoth offer standard accessibility features. One UI might provide deeper customization options.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (169g), slimmer (8mm)Heavier (200g), thicker (8.4mm)Moto G52 offers a significantly more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter weight and slimmer profile.

Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who needs a reliable phone for communication and quick tasks. The Moto G52's lighter weight and cleaner interface allow for effortless one-handed use during commutes, while the brighter screen of the Galaxy A15 ensures clear visibility even in direct sunlight. However, the Galaxy A15's superior processing power, indicated by its significantly higher Antutu score, shines when multitasking between apps or enjoying a quick mobile game during breaks.

Design Choice Impact: The Moto G52's choice of a near-stock Android experience prioritizes speed and simplicity, while the Galaxy A15's One UI offers extensive customization but adds complexity. The weight difference significantly impacts the physical experience of using the device, potentially favoring the Moto G52 for extended use.

Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User 1: Tech Novice: The Moto G52's intuitive interface and lighter weight make it an easier phone to pick up and use.

User 2: Power User: The Galaxy A15's powerful processor and customizable One UI offer greater control and flexibility.

User 3: Outdoor Enthusiast: The Galaxy A15's dramatically brighter display ensures readability in bright sunlight, crucial for navigation and outdoor activities.

Design-Centric Decision Framework

Prioritize:

  • Simplicity and ease of use: Moto G52
  • Performance and customization: Galaxy A15
  • Outdoor visibility: Galaxy A15
  • Comfort for extended use: Moto G52

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A15

While I appreciate the Moto G52's user-friendly design and lighter weight, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A15. The significantly faster processor, brighter display for outdoor use, and newer Android OS outweigh the benefits of the Moto G52 for me. While the added weight might be a slight drawback, the performance boost and long-term software support of the A15 are crucial for a satisfying user experience in the long run. The extra performance headroom ensures the phone remains responsive and capable of handling future app updates and features. As a technology enthusiast, I value the longevity and future-proofing offered by the A15's robust hardware and software combination.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.