Motorola Moto G52 vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 169 g 182 g
Height 160.1 mm 162.4 mm
Width 74.5 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Motorola Moto G52 and the Oppo Reno11, moving beyond mere specs to understand their impact on your daily life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMoto G52Oppo Reno11User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android, clean aestheticsColorOS, customizable but potentially bloatedG52 offers a simpler, potentially faster experience. Reno11 provides more customization options.
Interaction FlowSmooth, thanks to 90Hz displaySmoother, due to 120Hz displayReno11's higher refresh rate makes scrolling and animations visually more appealing.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresColorOS accessibility featuresBoth likely offer similar accessibility features, but specifics need further investigation.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (169g)Heavier (182g)G52 might be more comfortable for extended use, especially one-handed.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're at an outdoor concert on a sunny day. The Reno11's dramatically brighter display (1400 nits) ensures you can easily see the screen to capture photos and videos, unlike the G52, which might struggle in direct sunlight. Later, you want to quickly share those 4K videos you captured with the Reno11's superior camera. Its significantly faster 67W charging gets you back to full power much quicker than the G52's 30W charging.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: A Senior Citizen: The G52's lighter weight and cleaner interface might be less overwhelming.

User 2: A Creative Professional: The Reno11's superior camera capabilities, faster processor (evident in the Antutu score difference), and larger storage options would be more appealing. The faster refresh rate also benefits visual tasks.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The G52 prioritizes simplicity and ease of use, ideal for users who value a clean, bloatware-free experience and comfortable handling.

The Reno11 is a performance-oriented device with a focus on multimedia creation and consumption. It caters to users who demand speed, a vibrant display, and advanced camera features.

My Choice: The Oppo Reno11

While the Moto G52 offers a respectable user experience, especially for its price point, I would choose the Oppo Reno11. As a technology communicator focusing on user experience, the Reno11's superior display, significantly faster performance, advanced camera features including a telephoto lens, and incredibly fast charging resonate strongly with my need for a device that can keep up with my on-the-go lifestyle and creative endeavors. The smoother 120Hz display elevates everyday interactions. While heavier, the benefits in performance and visual clarity outweigh the slight difference in weight for me. The jump in performance indicated by the Antutu score is substantial and promises a more future-proof device, critical for long-term usability. Ultimately, the Reno11 offers a more compelling and complete user experience for my needs.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.