Motorola Moto G52 vs Motorola Moto G42 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 June 28, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 94.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 169 g 175 g
Height 160.1 mm 160.4 mm
Width 74.5 mm 73.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • Atlantic Green
  • Metallic Rose

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 53.01 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Motorola Moto G52 and Moto G42, transforming these technical specifications into meaningful user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMoto G52Moto G42User Experience Impact
Display6.6" AMOLED, 90Hz6.4" AMOLED, 60HzG52 offers a slightly larger, smoother display, enhancing media consumption and gaming. G42's smaller size might improve one-handed use.
PerformanceSnapdragon 680, Adreno 610, 216,000 AntutuSnapdragon 680, Adreno 610, 249,000 AntutuG42 boasts slightly better benchmark performance, potentially leading to faster app loading and multitasking.
Battery & Charging5000mAh, 30W Fast Charging5000mAh, 20W Fast ChargingG52's faster charging significantly reduces downtime, a crucial factor for busy users.
Camera50MP Main, wider selfie aperture50MP MainComparable main cameras, but G52 might offer slightly better low-light selfie performance due to the wider aperture.
AudioStereo Speakers, Dolby Atmos, 2 microphonesStereo Speakers, Dolby AtmosG52's additional microphone could enhance call quality and voice recording clarity.
BuildGorilla Glass 5UnknownG52's Gorilla Glass 5 provides better screen protection against scratches and drops, contributing to device longevity.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a student using the Moto G52. The larger, 90Hz display brings lecture slides and online videos to life, making learning more immersive. The faster charging ensures they're never caught with a dead battery between classes.

Now picture a photographer using the Moto G42. While both phones offer similar image quality, the G42's slightly higher benchmark score might translate to faster image processing, allowing for quicker editing and sharing.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to users seeking a balance of performance, affordability, and modern features. The G52, with its smoother display and faster charging, might appeal to media-heavy users and gamers. The G42, with its potentially faster processing, could be preferable for those prioritizing productivity and efficiency. Users concerned with durability would lean toward the G52 due to Gorilla Glass 5.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between these two phones hinges on individual priorities. Prioritize screen smoothness and fast charging? The G52 is your winner. If slightly better performance and a more compact feel are key, the G42 takes the lead.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Moto G52. While the performance difference is negligible in everyday use, the tangible benefits of a smoother 90Hz display, significantly faster 30W charging, and the added protection of Gorilla Glass 5 contribute to a more enjoyable and worry-free user experience. These factors, in my user-centric analysis, outweigh the minor performance advantage of the G42. The quicker charging, in particular, resonates with my vision of technology seamlessly integrating into a busy lifestyle. The smoother scrolling and animations offered by the 90Hz refresh rate also contribute significantly to a more fluid and premium user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.