Motorola Moto G52 vs Motorola Edge 40 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 April 4, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 169 g 199 g
Height 160.1 mm 161.2 mm
Width 74.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • Interstellar Black
  • Lunar Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 90 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 103.40 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 44.84 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4600 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G52 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Pro: A Tale of Two Experiences

As a technology communications specialist, my mission is to guide you through the intricate world of mobile devices, focusing on what truly matters: your experience. Let's delve into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G52 and the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, moving beyond mere specs to uncover the stories these devices tell.

1. Design and Usability: A Comparative Matrix

Feature CategoryMoto G52Edge 40 ProUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android with subtle Motorola customizationsStock Android with potential for more advanced features given the powerful hardwareG52 offers a clean, familiar interface; Edge 40 Pro might provide a more feature-rich experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz refresh rate provides smooth scrolling, but may show limitations in demanding tasks165Hz refresh rate delivers incredibly fluid animations and responsiveness, enhancing gaming and multitasking.Edge 40 Pro offers a significantly smoother and more enjoyable user experience, especially noticeable in visually demanding applications.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsLikely similar to G52, with potential for enhanced features leveraging the superior processor.Both devices likely offer standard accessibility features, but the Edge 40 Pro's hardware could enable more sophisticated options in the future.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (169g) and slightly smaller, potentially more comfortable for one-handed useHeavier (199g) and slightly larger, may feel more premium but less comfortable for extended use.G52 prioritizes comfortable handling; Edge 40 Pro leans towards a more substantial, potentially less ergonomic feel.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration: Painting a Picture of Use

Scenario: Imagine a sunny afternoon at the park. You're trying to capture a video of your dog chasing a frisbee.

  • Moto G52: You can record a decent 1080p video, but the bright sunlight might wash out the screen, making it difficult to frame the shot.
  • Edge 40 Pro: The vibrant 1100 nit display cuts through the glare, allowing for clear visibility. You can even capture stunning 8K video, preserving every detail of your furry friend's joyful leaps. The superior image stabilization ensures a smooth, professional-looking video.

This scenario highlights how seemingly dry specs like brightness and video resolution translate into tangible real-world differences.

3. Inclusive Technology: A Device for Every User?

Both devices cater to a broad audience with their stock Android experience. However, the Edge 40 Pro's significantly faster processor and smoother display make it a better choice for power users, gamers, and those who value a premium, responsive experience. The G52, with its lighter weight and longer battery life, might appeal to users prioritizing comfort and portability.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework: Beyond the Numbers

Choosing between these devices isn't just about comparing numbers; it's about understanding your priorities.

  • Prioritize Comfort and Battery Life: Moto G52
  • Prioritize Performance and Premium Features: Edge 40 Pro

My Choice: The Motorola Edge 40 Pro

While the Moto G52 offers a solid user experience, I would choose the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. Its superior performance, stunning display, and advanced camera capabilities create a truly engaging and future-proof mobile experience. The fluid 165Hz refresh rate, bright screen, and fast charging significantly enhance daily interactions. While the added weight might be a minor drawback, the overall user experience offered by the Edge 40 Pro is simply compelling. It's a device that not only meets my needs but also sparks excitement and inspires creativity. It embodies the kind of thoughtful design that elevates technology from a tool to a true companion.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.