Alright, let's dive into this comparison of the Motorola Moto G51 5G and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. We've got two phones targeting the budget-conscious market, but they each bring different strengths to the table. Let's see how they stack up, focusing on real-world performance and user experience.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed look at how these two phones compare, with a focus on what these differences mean for you in daily use:
| Feature | Motorola Moto G51 5G | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 170.5 × 76.5 × 9.1 mm | 164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mm | The ZTE is more compact and slightly thinner, making it more pocketable. The Moto is larger, which might be preferable for media consumption but less convenient for single-hand use. |
| Weight | 208g | 189g | The ZTE feels lighter and more comfortable for extended use, which can be a real plus in your daily routine. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.8" | 6.6" | The Moto's larger screen offers a more immersive experience for watching videos and playing games, but might be unwieldy for some. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | The Moto provides sharper text, images, and overall visuals due to its higher resolution. |
| PPI | 387 | 267 | The Moto's higher pixel density means less graininess and a crisper screen. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | Both displays are quite similar in color reproduction, viewing angles and contrast, this is a baseline comparison, they are nearly the same in terms of technology used. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | The Moto offers slightly smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both have similar peak brightness, which might be an issue in direct sunlight (we need the data to verify). |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Unisoc T606 | The Moto’s Snapdragon is more powerful, leading to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. |
| AnTuTu Score | 381,000 | 240,000 | The Moto will handle demanding tasks much better, such as fast paced games, video editing, etc. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP1 | The Moto's GPU is significantly stronger, translating to better graphics performance and smoother gameplay. |
| Battery Life | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both should offer all-day battery life for typical users, but usage will vary. |
| Charging | 10W Fast Charging | 22.5W Fast Charging | The ZTE charges notably faster, which is a great convenience when you're in a hurry. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Camera (Main) | 50MP f/1.8 | 50MP f/1.8 | Both have a capable 50MP main sensor for decent photos in good light, but processing differs. |
| Selfie Camera | 13MP f/2.2 | 8MP | The Moto should have a slight edge in selfie quality due to the higher resolution. |
| Additional Lenses | Wide Angle and Macro | None | The Moto's additional lenses increase versatility, allowing for more diverse shots. |
| Video Recording | 1080p @ 30/60/240fps | 1080p @ 30fps | The Moto offers higher frame rates for slow-motion and video capabilities. |
| Features | Triple Camera, LAF, RAW | Dual Camera, Digital Image Stabilisation | The Moto's laser autofocus improves focusing speed and precision, and RAW gives more flexibility in post editing, while the ZTE's digital image stabilisation helps minimize shakiness in videos. |
| Software | |||
| Operating System | Android 11 (Upgradable to 12) | Android 13 | The ZTE runs a newer OS out of the box, with more modern features and better security. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi Standards | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both support similar wifi standards, providing a smooth and consistent network connection. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 LE | 5.0 LE | The Moto's slightly newer Bluetooth should offer slightly better energy efficiency, and a more reliable connection. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Both phones can accurately determine your location, the Moto additionally supports SUPL |
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Both support Dual SIM cards, allowing you to manage two numbers at once, good if you have a work and a personal number. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64/128GB | 128/256GB | The ZTE offers greater storage space for those with many apps and media. |
| RAM | 4/8GB | 4/8GB | Both are available with 4 GB and 8 GB of RAM, so both phones are suitable for multitasking. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Both phones lack the option for expandable storage through SD cards. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, 2 microphones | DTS / DTS X | The Moto's audio is enhanced, making the media experience feel more immersive, while the ZTE audio system is great for movies and music. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Side-mounted Fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted Fingerprint sensor | Both provide basic security. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Unknown | No known difference. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Both phones have the same basic configuration for sensors. |
2. Key Insights
Motorola Moto G51 5G:
- Strengths: Superior performance with the Snapdragon 480+ 5G, noticeably sharper and smoother display (higher resolution and 120Hz refresh), more versatile camera system with ultra-wide and macro lenses, and better audio thanks to Dolby Atmos and 2 microphones.
- Competitive Advantages: Better for gaming, media consumption, and overall multitasking, as well as better for taking photos or videos.
- Trade-offs: It’s bulkier and heavier, has an older Android version, and slightly slower charging.
ZTE Blade A75 4G:
- Strengths: More compact and lighter build, faster charging, more storage and a newer version of Android 13 out-of-the-box.
- Competitive Advantages: Better for those who want a lighter and smaller device, good for the budget-conscious user who needs more storage, great for people who want a device that is not bulky in day-to-day life.
- Trade-offs: Less powerful processor, lower resolution display, and a less versatile camera system.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Motorola Moto G51 5G:
- Ideal For: Users who prioritize performance, media consumption, and camera quality. This includes gamers, frequent video watchers, and those who need a reliable phone for demanding tasks.
- Use Cases: Mobile gaming, streaming high-resolution video, capturing detailed photos and videos, and smooth multitasking.
ZTE Blade A75 4G:
- Ideal For: Users who prefer a more affordable, compact, and lightweight device, value storage and want a device with the latest software.
- Use Cases: Everyday use, light browsing, social media, extended battery life, a large storage for saving files and documents.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to guide your decision:
- Performance Needs: How important is processing power and graphic capability for you? (Gaming, multitasking etc.)
- Display Quality: Do you value a sharper and smoother display or is something adequate enough?
- Portability: How much do you care about the size and weight of your phone?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For the Gamer/Media Buff: Go with the Motorola Moto G51 5G. It offers the performance and visual fidelity for gaming and a smooth experience.
- For the Everyday User on a Budget: The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a great option. It provides the basic necessities with the latest Android version, a lighter build, and more storage.
- For the Mobile Photographer: The Motorola Moto G51 5G is the better option for taking photos because of the variety of lenses and enhanced sensor.
My Choice
If I were to pick between these two, I'd go with the Motorola Moto G51 5G. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers some compelling advantages like more storage and newer software, the Motorola's performance, display, camera capabilities and more versatile camera system are where I'd place my focus. As someone who uses a phone for everything from media consumption to a bit of light gaming, these areas are crucial for my daily usage.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G has the edge in crucial areas and it's the one that would be more capable of handling a wider array of tasks.
