Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Motorola Moto G51 5G and the Samsung Galaxy M35. As a tech journalist with a penchant for engineering details, I'm excited to break down what these specs mean for you in the real world. Let's get started!
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here’s a detailed look at how these two phones stack up, focusing on practical implications:
| Feature | Motorola Moto G51 5G | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 170.5 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm | 162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm | G51 is taller and narrower; M35 is shorter and wider. Both are similarly thick. |
| Weight | 208g | 222g | G51 is slightly lighter, which might be more comfortable for extended use. |
| Build | Unknown | Gorilla Glass Victus | M35 has superior screen protection, meaning more durability against scratches and drops. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.8" | 6.6" | G51 offers more screen real estate, good for media consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2340 | Very similar sharpness. Not a huge difference in pixel density. |
| PPI | 387 | 390 | Very similar pixel density, both displays will look very sharp. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | M35 has better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors thanks to AMOLED. Great for media consumption. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Exynos 1380 | M35's 5nm Exynos chip is significantly more powerful; expect faster overall experience. |
| AnTuTu Score | 381,000 | 578,500 | M35 offers significantly better performance for gaming, multitasking and demanding apps |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 | M35's GPU will offer a much better gaming experience than the Moto. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 1.00µm | M35 has larger sensor and larger pixels for better light capture and detail. |
| Front Camera | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | Comparable selfie camera performance. |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS, 720p@480fps with EIS | M35 supports 4K recording and offers EIS for better video quality. |
| Camera Features | PDAF, LAF, RAW | 2x2 OCL, OIS, Ultra stable, AI engine, 4k video, Night mode, RAW 12 bits, DOL HDR | M35 is feature rich. Has OIS which should help a lot for video recording. |
| Battery Life | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 6000mAh | M35 has much larger battery; expect longer battery life. |
| Charging | 10W | 25W | M35 charges faster, reducing downtime. |
| Software | |||
| Operating System | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | Android 14 | M35 has a newer OS and is likely to receive more software updates. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | M35 has a newer Wi-Fi standard. Faster internet speeds when you have a Wi-Fi 6 router. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 | M35 has a newer bluetooth for better connectivity with accessories. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | M35 supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64GB/128GB | 128GB/256GB | M35 has a higher storage option; offers double storage compared to the base G51 model |
| RAM | 4GB/8GB | 6GB/8GB | M35 has more RAM for better multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Both phones do not have expandable storage |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, 2 microphones | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | M35 has an edge with stereo speakers and Hi-Res Audio; better for media consumption |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint | Side mounted | Side mounted | Both phones offer basic biometric security. |
2. Key Insights
Motorola Moto G51 5G:
- Strengths: Larger display, slightly lighter weight, more affordable.
- Competitive Advantages: A larger display for media consumption, slightly lighter weight, and a lower price point. Good for those seeking a bigger screen on a budget.
- Trade-offs: Older chipset, weaker graphics, smaller battery, slower charging, older OS. Limited by its performance in demanding apps.
Samsung Galaxy M35:
- Strengths: Significantly better performance, superior AMOLED display, larger battery, faster charging, higher video resolution with stabilization, more modern OS.
- Competitive Advantages: The M35 excels in performance, camera quality and battery life. A better device for gaming and daily use.
- Trade-offs: Heavier, slightly smaller display. May be slightly more expensive than the G51.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Motorola Moto G51 5G is ideal for:
- Budget-conscious buyers: Seeking an affordable 5G device with a big screen.
- Casual users: Who primarily use their phones for browsing, social media, and media consumption.
- Those who prioritize large screens: And don't need top-tier performance or camera features.
Samsung Galaxy M35 is ideal for:
- Performance enthusiasts: Who want a smooth and fast experience for gaming and demanding apps.
- Multimedia lovers: Who appreciate a high-quality display and good speakers.
- Camera-focused users: Who value detailed photos, better stabilization for videos, and higher video quality.
- Users who need longer battery life and faster charging: The 6000 mAh battery will last a very long time.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to help you decide:
How important is performance?
- If high performance and gaming are crucial, go for the Samsung M35.
- If you are a casual user and performance is not a big concern the G51 would work for you.
What kind of display do you prefer?
- If you want vibrant colors and deep blacks, the Samsung M35 with its AMOLED screen is the way to go.
- If you need a bigger display with a basic LCD screen, the G51 would be better.
What is your budget and what do you value?
- If budget is your biggest concern and performance is not the highest priority, the G51 is more affordable.
- If you can stretch your budget, the M35 will be a better choice in every area.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- The Gamer: Samsung Galaxy M35 is the clear choice with better performance, graphics and more video recording features.
- The Media Consumer: Samsung Galaxy M35 provides better display quality, sound quality and battery life.
- The Budget Buyer: Motorola Moto G51 5G is the more affordable option, but be prepared for lesser performance and a simpler display.
- The Daily User: Samsung Galaxy M35 is more powerful, has better cameras and an overall better experience.
My Choice
If I had to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy M35. Here’s why:
While the Motorola Moto G51 5G offers a large screen and a lower price point, the Samsung Galaxy M35 offers a much better overall experience. The superior AMOLED display, more powerful processor, larger battery, faster charging and better camera performance make it a more versatile and future-proof device. As someone who appreciates the smooth experience that good performance brings to the table, the M35 feels like the better option. The difference between the screens, the cameras, and battery are all a big difference. The M35 is also more likely to have more software support.
I know the price might be a hurdle for some, but I believe the value proposition of the M35 significantly outweighs the G51. The M35 provides a smooth user experience, which makes it worth the investment for me.
