Okay, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Motorola Moto G51 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. We'll break down the specs, highlight key differences, and get a feel for how these phones stack up in the real world.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here’s a detailed comparison of the key specs, focusing on what they mean for you, the user:
| Feature | Motorola Moto G51 5G | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 170.5 × 76.5 × 9.1 mm | 163.7 × 76.1 × 7.6 mm | The A73 is thinner and more compact, potentially more pocketable and comfortable. |
| Weight | 208g | 181g | The A73 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.8" | 6.7" | Very similar screen sizes, a negligible difference in daily use. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Identical sharpness, both offer Full HD+ clarity. |
| PPI | 387 | 393 | Virtually identical pixel density; expect crisp text and images on both. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | Major Difference: The A73 will offer much richer colors, true blacks, and better outdoor visibility thanks to AMOLED. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Smooth scrolling and animations on both phones. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones have identical peak brightness; It's odd that the data reports 0, this needs more clarification. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Major Difference: The A73's chip is significantly more powerful, expect snappier performance and better gaming. |
| AnTuTu Score | 381,000 | 575,551 | The A73 outperforms the G51 considerably in benchmarks; this translates to better multitasking and app performance. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L | The A73 has a more advanced GPU for better graphics performance. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8 | 108MP, f/1.8 | Major Difference: The A73's higher resolution should capture more detail and allow for better cropping. |
| Selfie Camera | 13MP, f/2.2 | 32MP, f/2.2 | The A73's selfie camera has a much higher resolution, delivering crisper selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP | 12MP, f/2.2 | The A73 captures wider shots with slightly more detail. |
| Depth Sensor | N/A | 5MP, f/2.4 | The A73 has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode effects. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP | 5MP, f/2.4 | The A73 has a higher-resolution macro lens for capturing fine details up close. |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | Major Difference: The A73 can record in 4K, it includes EIS. |
| Stabilization | No | Yes | The A73 has EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization) which provides smoother footage. |
| Battery Life | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery capacity should give similar battery endurance. |
| Charging | 10W | 25W | Major Difference: The A73 will charge much faster, reducing downtime. |
| Features | Non-removable | Bypass Charging, Non-removable | The A73 can be used while charging without impacting battery health (Bypass Charging). |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to 12 | Android 12, upgradable to 16 | The A73 starts with a newer OS and will likely receive more updates and support. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 | The A73 supports the latest Wi-Fi standard, offering faster speeds and better performance. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 | Both offer A2DP, but the A73 has a more complete profile suite and G51 has newer version. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Both offer similar GPS capabilities; the Moto G51 offers SUPL support as well |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 64GB or 128GB | 128GB or 256GB | The A73 offers twice the storage at its maximum option. |
| RAM | 4GB or 8GB | 6GB or 8GB | The A73 offers 6GB at its base configuration, which should provide better multitasking. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | No expandable storage for both. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Dolby Atmos, 2 Microphones | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | The A73 offers stereo speakers, and the G51 offers dual microphones. Both offer Dolby Atmos. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Basic fingerprint sensor | The G51 has a more convenient side-mounted sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | The A73 has superior screen protection against scratches and drops. |
| Sensors | Biometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Biometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtual | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has a more comprehensive array of sensors including a compass, geomagnetic and rgb sensors |
2. Key Insights
- Samsung Galaxy A73 5G Strengths:
- Superior Display: The AMOLED screen is a game-changer, providing vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast.
- Much Better Performance: The Snapdragon 778G is a powerhouse, making everyday tasks smoother and gaming much more enjoyable.
- Enhanced Camera System: Higher-resolution sensors, 4K video recording, and OIS/EIS result in far superior photos and videos.
- Faster Charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces battery refill times.
- More Software Support: Newer OS with better support, potentially receiving more OS upgrades, leading to longevity.
- Motorola Moto G51 5G Strengths:
- More Convenient Fingerprint Sensor: The side-mounted fingerprint sensor tends to be quicker and more ergonomically accessible to many users.
- More Affordable: Typically a budget-friendly option, especially for those seeking basic 5G connectivity without breaking the bank.
- Trade-offs and Limitations:
- Motorola G51: Sacrifices overall performance and camera quality in favor of affordability.
- Samsung A73: It is a significantly more expensive option.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
- Samsung Galaxy A73 5G:
- Ideal For: Users who prioritize a great display, high performance, and superior camera capabilities.
- Use Cases: Gamers, mobile photographers, video content creators, and those who heavily consume multimedia. It's well-suited for users who want a premium experience without going into flagship territory.
- Motorola Moto G51 5G:
- Ideal For: Budget-conscious buyers who need basic 5G connectivity and don't prioritize high-end features.
- Use Cases: Everyday use like browsing the web, social media, and basic apps. It's a good option for those who need a reliable phone without spending a lot of money.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to help you decide:
- How important is display quality? If you value vibrant colors and deep blacks for media consumption, the A73's AMOLED is a must.
- How much performance do you need? If you plan to game, multitask heavily, or use demanding apps, the A73's Snapdragon 778G is essential.
- What's your budget? The Moto G51 is a budget-friendly phone, while the A73 commands a higher price due to its premium features.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- "I just need a 5G phone for basic tasks and don't want to spend a lot." Go for the Motorola Moto G51 5G.
- "I want a great camera and smooth experience, plus I want to make videos on the go." The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is the better choice, its superior camera and overall performance will greatly improve your experience.
- "I value long-term software support and want a phone that stays up-to-date." The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G with its guaranteed software updates will be the better option here.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two, I'd absolutely go with the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. The AMOLED display is a major selling point for me, and the performance jump with the Snapdragon 778G is significant. As someone who frequently uses my phone for media consumption, photography, and occasional gaming, the A73 offers a far more compelling experience. While the price difference is something to consider, the improvements in display quality, camera capabilities, and overall performance are well worth the investment for my needs.
While the Motorola Moto G51 5G is a solid budget option, the trade-offs in display, processing power, and camera quality are too significant to ignore for the use-case I require. The A73 strikes a better balance of performance and features, making it the more appealing option overall.
