Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto G51 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G. We've got two solid contenders here, each with its own set of strengths. I'll break down the tech specs, translate them into real-world scenarios, and help you figure out which phone might be the better fit for you.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed look at the key technical specifications, along with a breakdown of what they mean for daily use:
| Feature | Motorola Moto G51 5G | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 170.5 × 76.5 × 9.1 mm, 208g | 162.1 × 77.6 × 8.3 mm, 195g | Moto is taller and thicker, but the A24 is wider and slightly lighter, affecting in-hand feel and pocketability. |
| Build | Standard | Standard | Both are typical smartphone builds with no advanced design features. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.8" | 6.5" | Moto offers a slightly larger screen which can be nice for media consumption, but not a huge difference |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | Similar sharpness on both displays, with no immediately visible difference |
| Pixel Density | 387 PPI | 396 PPI | Both have very similar pixel density, translating to nearly identical sharpness on each display |
| Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | AMOLED on the A24 provides deeper blacks, higher contrast, and better outdoor visibility |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | Moto has a slightly smoother scrolling experience, though the difference is not dramatic. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | A24 has vastly better outdoor visibility under bright sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm) | Helio G99 (6nm) | The A24 offers better overall performance based on benchmark scores, particularly in gaming and multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 381,000 | 411,900 | A24 has slightly better benchmark performance, translating to a bit more responsiveness in day to day use |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 | Different GPUs, A24's is slightly superior in performance. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 50MP, f/1.8 | 50MP, f/1.8 | Both cameras are very similar for standard shots. |
| Selfie Camera | 13MP, f/2.2 | 13MP, f/2.2 | Comparable quality for selfies. |
| Wide-Angle Lens | 8MP | 5MP, f/2.2 | Moto has a higher resolution wide-angle lens, meaning less pixelation in wide shots. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP | 2MP, f/2.4 | Both have 2MP macro lenses, suitable for close-up photography. |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps, EIS | Moto offers higher fps, including slow-motion at 240fps, A24 offers more stable footage. |
| Features | LAF, RAW | OIS, Digital stabilization | Moto offers more fine tuned control with RAW capture and laser autofocus, while A24 is more point-and-shoot focused with OIS and stabilization |
| Battery Life | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both should easily last a full day for most users. |
| Charging | 10W | 25W | A24 charges considerably faster, minimizing downtime. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | Android 13 (upgradable to 17) | A24 offers a newer OS, with longer software support making it the better choice for the long term. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 ac | Wi-Fi 5 ac | Both phones support comparable Wi-Fi standards |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 LE | 5.3 LE | A24 has a more up-to-date Bluetooth version for better connectivity and power efficiency. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | The A24 has slightly better location accuracy with more satellite systems |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 64 GB / 128 GB | 128 GB | The A24 only comes in a 128GB variant, while the Moto can have a lower storage capacity. |
| RAM | 4 GB / 8 GB | 4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB | Both offer RAM options suitable for multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | No external storage option on either device. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Features | Dolby Atmos, 2 mics | Basic | Moto provides better audio quality and clear calls with noise cancelling microphones. |
| Security | |||
| Security | Side-mounted Fingerprint | Side-mounted Fingerprint | Both offer the same security features |
| Other Sensors | Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass | A24 has a compass, the Moto has light sensor. |
| Build Quality | Unknown | Unknown | No relevant data available for comparison |
2. Key Insights
Motorola Moto G51 5G Strengths:
- Larger Display: The 6.8-inch screen provides an immersive experience for media consumption.
- Smoother Refresh Rate: The 120Hz refresh rate offers a slightly smoother visual experience when scrolling or gaming.
- More Video Options: The higher frames per second video capabilities, and higher frame rate in slow-motion video give the Moto an advantage for video production.
- Superior Audio: It has Dolby Atmos and dual microphones, enhancing both media playback and call quality.
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Strengths:
- Superior Display Technology: AMOLED display with 1000 nits of brightness means better outdoor visibility and more vibrant visuals.
- Better Performance: The Helio G99 chipset offers a slight edge in benchmark scores, translating to slightly better responsiveness.
- Faster Charging: 25W charging significantly reduces charging times compared to Moto’s 10W.
- Newer Android OS: Comes with Android 13 out of the box, meaning more software updates and a longer lifecycle.
- Slightly Lighter: Easier to carry in your pocket.
- Better Camera Features: The digital and Optical stabilization of the A24 allow for more smooth and clear videos in day to day use.
Trade-offs and Limitations:
- The Moto G51 5G, while having a smoother refresh rate on its display, uses an IPS LCD panel which is not as vibrant and bright as the AMOLED panel on the Samsung. This also leads to significantly worse outdoor visibility.
- The Samsung A24 4G does not have as high frame rate recording capability as the Moto, and has limited audio features.
- Neither phone has expandable storage which might be limiting for heavy media users.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Motorola Moto G51 5G is Ideal For:
- Media Consumers: Users who frequently watch videos or movies and appreciate a larger screen with smoother motion.
- Audio Enthusiasts: Those who value high-quality audio playback and clear voice capture for calls or recordings.
- Budget-Conscious: Users who prioritize a good value and don't need the latest specs.
- Video Content Creators: Those who want higher frame rate recording, and more frame rate flexibility.
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is Ideal For:
- Outdoor Users: Those who need a bright display for visibility in bright sunlight.
- Everyday Performers: Users who want a responsive phone with a modern UI.
- Fast Charging Fans: Those who appreciate fast charging and less time tethered to the wall.
- Long-term Users: People who prioritize updated software and long-term support.
- Casual Photographers: Those who want a device that will stabilize pictures and videos more reliably without needing to tweak settings.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to help you decide:
- How important is outdoor visibility to you? If you’re often in bright sunlight, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G's AMOLED display with 1000 nits will be a game-changer.
- Do you prefer smoother scrolling or faster app loading? If it's a silky smooth display that is a priority, the Motorola Moto G51 5G's 120Hz display will be better. However, if you value slightly faster overall performance for apps and games, the Samsung A24 4G is the better bet.
- Is fast charging or long term updates important to you? The Samsung A24 4G has the better charging system, and offers more software updates, which helps it be a better option for those who plan to keep their phone for a long time.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For the frequent traveler: The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is better due to the brighter display and faster charging.
- For the casual user on a budget: The Motorola Moto G51 5G provides a great experience without breaking the bank.
- For the video creator: The Motorola Moto G51 5G provides slightly more options for video production.
- For the average consumer: The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G provides a better experience overall with its better display, more responsive chipset, faster charging, and better software support.
Personal Conclusion
If I had to choose, I would go with the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G. The superior AMOLED display with higher brightness is a significant advantage for outdoor use. The slightly better overall performance, faster charging, and better software support also contribute to a more modern and future-proof experience. Even though I do appreciate the higher frame rate video recording of the Moto G51 5G, the practical, everyday benefits of the A24 edge it out for me, especially given my frequent usage outside of controlled lighting situations. The A24 also offers more reliable results with its stabilization features, making it less of a hassle to use on the go.
