Motorola Moto G42 vs Xiaomi Poco M5s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2022 September 6, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 94.32 cm³ 99.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.6 "/g
Weight 175 g 178.8 g
Height 160.4 mm 160.5 mm
Width 73.5 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Atlantic Green
  • Metallic Rose
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 83.5 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1100 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 120.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.01 mAh/cm³ 50.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G76 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G42 vs. Xiaomi Poco M5s: A Detailed Comparison

Hello fellow tech enthusiasts! Today, we're diving deep into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G42 and the Xiaomi Poco M5s. Both phones aim for the budget-conscious consumer, but subtle differences in their specifications create distinct user experiences. Let's dissect these nuances and uncover which phone reigns supreme.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G42Xiaomi Poco M5sReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.4 x 73.5 x 8160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3Poco M5s slightly larger and thicker
Weight (g)175178.8Negligible difference in hand feel
Build MaterialPlasticPlasticImpacts durability and premium feel (data missing)
Display
TypeAMOLEDAMOLEDVibrant colors, deep blacks
Size (inches)6.46.43Virtually identical screen real estate
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Sharp and detailed visuals
Peak Brightness (nits)(Data Missing)1100Poco M5s offers better outdoor visibility
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680Helio G95Helio G95 generally offers better gaming performance
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz)Comparable everyday performance, G95 might edge out in demanding tasks
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G76 MC4G95's GPU delivers stronger graphics performance
RAM (GB)44/6/8Poco M5s offers more RAM options for better multitasking
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50+8+264+8+2+2Poco M5s boasts higher resolution main sensor and dedicated macro lens
Front Camera (MP)1613Moto G42 has a slightly higher resolution selfie camera
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsPoco M5s capable of 4K video recording
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity
Fast Charging20W33WPoco M5s charges significantly faster

2. Key Insights

Both phones offer beautiful AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and excellent contrast. However, the Poco M5s's superior peak brightness gives it a significant advantage in outdoor readability.

While the Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G42 is a reliable performer for everyday tasks, the Helio G95 in the Poco M5s provides a noticeable boost in gaming and demanding applications thanks to its more powerful GPU. The availability of higher RAM configurations in the Poco M5s further enhances its multitasking capabilities.

In the camera department, the Poco M5s's 64MP main sensor promises better detail and low-light performance compared to the Moto G42's 50MP sensor. Additionally, the Poco M5s includes a dedicated macro lens, although the practical benefits of a 2MP macro lens are often debatable. The Moto G42 might offer slightly better selfie quality due to its higher resolution front camera. Crucially, the Poco M5s can record 4K video, a feature absent in the Moto G42.

Battery life should be comparable due to similar battery capacities. However, the Poco M5s's significantly faster 33W charging provides a major convenience.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G42: Best suited for users prioritizing a clean Android experience, vibrant display quality for media consumption, and all-around balanced performance for everyday tasks. Its lower price point makes it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers who don't engage in heavy gaming or require 4K video recording.

Poco M5s: Ideal for users seeking a more powerful device for gaming, media creation (due to 4K video), and demanding multitasking. The faster charging speed is a significant bonus for those constantly on the go.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Ask Yourself:

  1. What's your budget? The Moto G42 generally comes at a lower price.
  2. Is gaming or demanding performance a priority? If yes, the Poco M5s is the clear winner.
  3. How important is fast charging? The Poco M5s's 33W charging is considerably quicker.

My Choice: The Xiaomi Poco M5s

While both are compelling devices, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco M5s. The performance advantage offered by the Helio G95, coupled with the brighter display and significantly faster charging, outweighs the minor price difference for me. The ability to record 4K video also adds future-proofing and creative flexibility. While the Moto G42 is a solid contender for basic tasks and media consumption, the Poco M5s provides a more well-rounded and powerful experience that better suits my needs. Its superior feature set provides more headroom for demanding tasks and ensures a smoother user experience in the long run.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.