Motorola Moto G42 vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date June 28, 2022 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.32 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 175 g 202 g
Height 160.4 mm 164.1 mm
Width 73.5 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Atlantic Green
  • Metallic Rose
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.01 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Adreno 610 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G42 vs. vivo X100: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Hello, fellow tech explorers! Today, we're dissecting two intriguing contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena: the Motorola Moto G42 and the vivo X100. Let's delve beneath the surface and uncover what each device truly offers.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G42vivo X100Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.4 x 73.5 x 8164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5X100 slightly larger, potentially less pocketable
Weight (g)175202G42 noticeably lighter for extended use
Display
Size (inches)6.46.78X100 offers more screen real estate for media consumption
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001260 x 2800X100 sharper, but both are sufficiently crisp
TypeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDX100's LTPO enables dynamic refresh rates for smoother scrolling and power saving
Refresh Rate (Hz)60 (static)120X100 significantly smoother for gaming and animations
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680Dimensity 9300X100 vastly more powerful for demanding tasks and multitasking
CPUOcta-core (2.4 GHz)Octa-core (3.25 GHz)X100 offers significantly faster processing speeds
RAM (GB)412X100's ample RAM enables seamless multitasking and app switching
OSAndroid 12Android 14X100 boasts newer OS with potential feature and security advantages
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution, but sensor and lens quality differ
Ultrawide (MP)812X100's ultrawide likely captures more detail and wider field of view
Telephoto (MP)N/A64X100 offers optical zoom for capturing distant subjects
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Comparable battery capacity
Fast Charging18W120WX100 charges dramatically faster

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Powerhouse: The vivo X100, with its Dimensity 9300 chip and a whopping 12GB of RAM, is a clear winner in performance. It's built for demanding users who need a phone that can handle heavy multitasking, gaming, and content creation with ease. The Moto G42, while capable for everyday tasks, will likely struggle with more intensive applications.
  • Display Dynamics: While both phones feature AMOLED screens, the X100's LTPO panel with a 120Hz refresh rate delivers a noticeably smoother and more responsive visual experience. This translates to fluid scrolling, crisper gaming, and reduced motion blur.
  • Camera Capabilities: The vivo X100 boasts a more versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom and a higher-resolution ultrawide sensor. The inclusion of Zeiss optics hints at superior image quality. The G42's camera system is more basic, suitable for casual photography.
  • Charging Champion: The X100's 120W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing you to replenish the battery incredibly quickly. The Moto G42's 18W charging, while adequate, pales in comparison.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G42: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize essential smartphone functionalities like calling, texting, browsing, and light social media usage. It's a reliable workhorse for undemanding tasks.
  • vivo X100: Ideal for power users, mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and anyone who demands top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a versatile camera system. It's an investment in a premium mobile experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The G42 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? For basic tasks, the G42 suffices. For demanding applications, choose the X100.
  3. Which features matter most? Prioritize battery life? The X100 offers blazing fast charging. Need a smooth display? The X100's 120Hz refresh rate is a delight.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who often pushes devices to their limits, I'd choose the vivo X100. The superior performance, stunning display, versatile camera system, and incredibly fast charging are compelling. While the price is higher, the X100 offers a substantial upgrade in user experience that justifies the investment for my needs. I value the fluidity of a high refresh rate display, the power for seamless multitasking, and the ability to capture high-quality photos and videos. The rapid charging is a huge bonus in my fast-paced life.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.