Motorola Moto G42 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 94.32 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 175 g 213 g
Height 160.4 mm 161.1 mm
Width 73.5 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Atlantic Green
  • Metallic Rose
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.01 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G42 and the Samsung Galaxy A55, dissecting their specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G42Samsung Galaxy A55Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.4 x 73.5 x 8161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly larger, might feel less compact in hand.
Weight (g)175213G42 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.46.6A55 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TypeAMOLEDSuper AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Super AMOLED on the A55 might have slightly better brightness and outdoor visibility.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Nearly identical pixel density, resulting in sharp visuals on both.
Refresh Rate (Hz)60120A55's 120Hz refresh rate delivers significantly smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall user experience.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680Exynos 1480A55 boasts a more powerful and recent processor, leading to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2.4 GHz)Octa-core (2.75 GHz)A55's higher clock speed translates to improved responsiveness.
GPUAdreno 610Xclipse 530A55's GPU provides a significant advantage in graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM (GB)48/12A55 offers more RAM, ensuring smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding apps.
OSAndroid 12Android 14A55 comes with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security updates.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution, but A55 utilizes a larger sensor (Sony IMX906) potentially capturing more light and detail.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA55 capable of recording higher resolution video.
FeaturesTriple CameraTriple Camera + OISA55 includes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for significantly smoother videos and reduced blur in low-light photos.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity suggests comparable longevity.
Fast Charging20W25WA55 supports slightly faster charging.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A55 emerges as the clear winner in terms of performance, display, and camera capabilities. Its more powerful processor, higher refresh rate display, superior GPU, and inclusion of OIS for video recording provide a noticeable advantage in everyday use. The A55 also benefits from a newer operating system, promising longer software support.

The Moto G42's strength lies in its lighter weight and lower price point. It offers a solid foundation for everyday tasks and casual media consumption.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G42: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight phone for essential communication, web browsing, and light media consumption.
  • Samsung Galaxy A55: Ideal for users who demand a smooth and responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, capture high-quality photos and videos, and value the latest software features.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The G42 offers excellent value for its price, while the A55 commands a premium for its superior features.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For basic tasks, the G42 suffices. For demanding apps, gaming, and high-quality media, the A55 is better.
  3. How important is long-term software support? The A55, running a newer Android version, is likely to receive updates for a longer period.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

If I were choosing between these two, I'd opt for the Samsung Galaxy A55. The smoother 120Hz display, significantly improved performance thanks to the Exynos 1480 and ample RAM, the inclusion of OIS for stable video recording, and the promise of longer software updates are compelling advantages. While the A55 is heavier and more expensive, the enhanced user experience justifies the premium in my view. As a tech enthusiast, I appreciate the future-proofing that the A55 provides with its more modern hardware and software. The performance gap between the Snapdragon 680 and the Exynos 1480 is significant, impacting everything from app loading times to gaming capabilities. The superior camera features of the A55, particularly the OIS, are also crucial for capturing high-quality content.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.