Motorola Moto G42 vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2022 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.32 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 175 g 199 g
Height 160.4 mm 161.3 mm
Width 73.5 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Atlantic Green
  • Metallic Rose
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.01 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G42 vs. Samsung Galaxy A34: A Real-World Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto G42 and the Samsung Galaxy A34, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer users in their daily lives.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G42Samsung Galaxy A34Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.4 x 73.5 x 8161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2A34 slightly larger; negligible difference in hand feel for most users.
Weight (g)175199G42 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.46.6A34 offers a slightly larger viewing area for media consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness; both offer crisp visuals.
TypeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED, 120HzA34's Super AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and more vibrant colors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GDimensity 1080A34's Dimensity 1080 generally offers better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2.4 GHz)Octa-core (2.6 GHz)A34 boasts faster clock speeds, translating to quicker app loading and multitasking.
RAM (GB)46/8A34's larger RAM options enable smoother multitasking and handle more demanding applications.
OSAndroid 12Android 13A34 comes with a newer OS version, offering potential feature and security updates.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5048Comparable main camera performance expected, but real-world image quality needs further testing.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA34 significantly outperforms with 4K video recording capability.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, depending on usage patterns.
Fast Charging20W25WA34 offers slightly faster charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the more powerful and feature-rich device. Its 120Hz Super AMOLED display provides a noticeably smoother and visually engaging experience. The Dimensity 1080 chipset, coupled with more RAM, ensures superior performance for gaming and demanding tasks. The A34 also boasts 4K video recording and a newer Android version. However, it is heavier and slightly more expensive.

The Motorola Moto G42, while less powerful, offers a lighter and potentially more affordable option. Its AMOLED display still delivers vibrant visuals, though without the high refresh rate. It's a solid choice for users prioritizing battery life, a clean Android experience, and value for money.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Power User/Gamer: The Galaxy A34 is the clear winner, thanks to its superior processing power, RAM, and display. The enhanced performance and smoother visuals are crucial for demanding applications and gaming.
  • Budget-Conscious User: The Moto G42 offers excellent value for its price. If your usage primarily involves everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light photography, the G42 is a compelling option.
  • Media Enthusiast: While both phones have good displays, the Galaxy A34's 120Hz refresh rate and larger screen size make it a better choice for watching videos and playing games.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G42 is generally more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks and gaming, choose the A34. For everyday use, the G42 might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and smoothness? The A34's 120Hz Super AMOLED display is a significant advantage if visual quality is a priority.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

If I were choosing between these two, I'd opt for the Samsung Galaxy A34. While the Moto G42 is a commendable budget option, the A34's superior performance, smoother display, and future-proof features (like 5G and newer Android version) are compelling. As a tech journalist who often uses demanding applications and appreciates a premium visual experience, the A34 aligns better with my needs. The slightly higher price is justifiable for the significant jump in performance and features. The faster refresh rate, specifically, makes a tangible difference in daily use and enhances the overall enjoyment of the device. Furthermore, the longer software support expected from Samsung compared to Motorola makes the A34 a more future-proof investment.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.