Motorola Moto G42 vs Nothing Phone (1) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2022 July 16, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 94.32 cm³ 100.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 175 g 193.5 g
Height 160.4 mm 159.2 mm
Width 73.5 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Atlantic Green
  • Metallic Rose
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 104.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.01 mAh/cm³ 44.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G42 vs. Nothing Phone (1): A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G42 and the Nothing Phone (1), dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you, the user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G42Nothing Phone (1)Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.4 x 73.5 x 8159.2 x 75.8 x 8.3Moto G42 is slightly smaller and thinner. Nothing Phone (1) is a bit wider and thicker.
Weight (g)175193.5Moto G42 is noticeably lighter, contributing to better one-handed usability.
Build MaterialsPlasticGlass (Gorilla Glass 5)Nothing Phone (1) offers a more premium feel and potentially better durability, but glass is more prone to shattering.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Minimal difference in daily usage.
Display Size (inches)6.46.55Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, resulting in sharp visuals on both devices.
Refresh Rate (Hz)60 (Standard)120Nothing Phone (1)'s 120Hz refresh rate delivers significantly smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GSnapdragon 778G+ 5GNothing Phone (1) boasts a significantly more powerful processor, enabling faster app loading, multitasking, and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2.4 GHz)Octa-core (2.5 GHz)Nothing Phone (1) has a slight edge in CPU clock speed, further contributing to its performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 642LNothing Phone (1)'s GPU provides a substantial boost in graphics performance, beneficial for demanding games and applications.
RAM4GB8/12GBNothing Phone (1) offers more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and preventing apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable main camera resolution. Image quality will depend on sensor and software processing.
Ultrawide (MP)850Nothing Phone (1)'s higher resolution ultrawide offers superior detail and versatility.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsNothing Phone (1) supports 4K video recording, capturing more detail.
Battery Life
Battery Capacity (mAh)50004500Moto G42 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer usage time. Nothing Phone (1) supports faster charging (33W).

2. Key Insights

The Nothing Phone (1) clearly outperforms the Moto G42 in terms of performance, display refresh rate, and camera versatility. Its more powerful processor, higher RAM, 120Hz display, and superior ultrawide camera make it a more capable device for demanding users. However, the Moto G42 shines in its lighter weight and potentially longer battery life, thanks to its larger battery capacity. The Moto G42 is also notably more affordable.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G42: Ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and ease of use for everyday tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Its lighter weight makes it comfortable for extended use.

  • Nothing Phone (1): Best suited for users who value performance, a smooth display, and a more capable camera system for gaming, content creation, and multitasking. The unique design with the Glyph Interface may also appeal to those seeking a distinctive aesthetic.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Moto G42 offers excellent value for its price, while the Nothing Phone (1) commands a higher premium.
  • What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the Moto G42 suffices. For demanding applications and gaming, the Nothing Phone (1) is the clear winner.
  • Do you prioritize battery life or performance? The Moto G42 likely offers longer battery life, whereas the Nothing Phone (1) provides superior performance.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who often uses demanding apps and appreciates a smooth user experience, I would choose the Nothing Phone (1). The performance boost, 120Hz display, and more versatile camera system are compelling advantages. While the Moto G42 is a solid budget option, the Nothing Phone (1)'s superior features better align with my needs and preferences. The unique design is a bonus. However, if budget was a primary concern, the Moto G42 would be a very respectable alternative.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.