Motorola Moto G42 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 28, 2022 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 94.32 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 175 g 184.5 g
Height 160.4 mm 170.8 mm
Width 73.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Atlantic Green
  • Metallic Rose
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.01 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G42 vs. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G42 and the Razr 40 Ultra, two phones occupying different niches within the Motorola ecosystem. This isn't just about specs; it's about understanding how those numbers translate into your daily experience.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G42Motorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.4 x 73.5 x 8170.8 x 74 x 7Razr 40 Ultra is significantly more compact when folded, but thicker when unfolded. G42 is a traditional slab phone.
Weight (g)175184.5Negligible weight difference in daily use.
FoldableNoYesRazr offers unique portability and a second external display for quick interactions.
Display
TypeAMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr boasts a cutting-edge foldable display with a higher refresh rate (165Hz vs. standard 60Hz on the G42), potentially smoother scrolling and animations.
Size (inches)6.46.9Razr offers a larger main screen for immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2640Comparable sharpness; Razr is slightly taller due to aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate (Hz)60 (assumed)165Razr's 165Hz refresh rate provides significantly smoother visuals, especially in gaming and fast-paced content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Razr's flagship processor delivers vastly superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming. G42 handles everyday tasks well.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz & 3x2.75 GHz & 4x1.80 GHz)Razr offers significantly faster processing speeds and multitasking capabilities.
RAM (GB)412Razr's 12GB RAM ensures smooth multitasking and effortless app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5012G42 boasts higher megapixel count, but Razr potentially offers better low-light performance and image processing due to its flagship chipset.
Selfie Camera (MP)1632Razr has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50003800G42 likely offers longer battery life due to larger capacity and less demanding hardware.
Charging20W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingRazr charges faster, but overall battery endurance might be less than the G42.

2. Key Insights

The Moto G42 is a solid mid-range phone prioritizing battery life and affordability. It handles everyday tasks competently, offering a decent display and a long-lasting battery.

The Razr 40 Ultra is a premium foldable flagship, boasting cutting-edge technology, blazing-fast performance, and a unique form factor. Its foldable design and powerful hardware come at a higher price and potentially shorter battery life.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G42: Ideal for budget-conscious users, casual users prioritizing battery life, and those seeking a reliable, no-frills smartphone experience.

Razr 40 Ultra: Perfect for tech enthusiasts, early adopters who value innovation, users demanding top-tier performance, and those who prioritize portability and a unique design.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The G42 offers excellent value for its price, while the Razr 40 Ultra commands a premium.
  • What is your priority: performance or battery life? The Razr excels in performance, while the G42 shines in battery endurance.
  • Do you value a foldable design and its associated features? The Razr's foldable screen and external display offer unique functionality and portability.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

While the Moto G42 is a compelling budget option, I'd choose the Razr 40 Ultra. The foldable form factor genuinely intrigues me. The compact size when folded, combined with the expansive main screen and the interactive external display, offers a user experience unlike any traditional smartphone. I'm willing to compromise on battery life for the cutting-edge technology, flagship performance, and the sheer coolness of a foldable device. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ensures a future-proof experience, capable of handling anything I throw at it. As a tech enthusiast, I appreciate being on the leading edge of mobile innovation, and the Razr 40 Ultra delivers precisely that.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.