Motorola Moto G34 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 29, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 97.1 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.63 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 179 g 209 g
Height 162.7 mm 161.7 mm
Width 74.6 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ice Blue
  • Ocean Green
  • Charcoal Black
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.49 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G34 vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Holistic Technological Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis of the Moto G34 and Galaxy A35 extends beyond a simple specification comparison. I aim to provide a holistic understanding of these devices within the broader mobile technology landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureMotorola Moto G34Samsung Galaxy A35Technological ContextStrategic Category
Launch Date2023-12-292024-03-15Indicates market timing and potential integration of newer technologies.Innovation Potential
Display6.5" IPS LCD, 120Hz, 720x1600 (270 ppi)6.6" Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1080x2340 (390 ppi)AMOLED offers superior contrast and color accuracy. Higher resolution contributes to sharper visuals. 120Hz ensures smooth scrolling.User Experience Indicators
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Both are mid-range chipsets, but the 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1380 suggests potential performance and efficiency advantages.Performance Metrics
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Exynos 1380's use of Cortex-A78 cores indicates a focus on higher performance.Performance Metrics
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MP5GPU performance impacts gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. Requires further benchmarking for a definitive comparison.Performance Metrics
OSAndroid 13Android 14Newer OS version generally translates to feature updates and security patches. Longer OS support commitment is crucial.Ecosystem Integration
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity is comparable, but real-world usage will depend on optimization.User Experience Indicators
Camera (Video)1080p@30fps4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@60fps (EIS)The Galaxy A35 boasts superior video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS).User Experience Indicators
Price RangeMediumMediumPrice positioning within the market influences target audience and perceived value.Strategic Category

2. Strategic Technological Insights

  • Display Technology: The Galaxy A35's Super AMOLED display with higher resolution provides a significant advantage in visual quality. This reflects a broader trend of AMOLED adoption in mid-range devices.
  • Processor Performance: While both devices offer mid-range performance, the Exynos 1380's newer architecture and 5nm process suggest a potential edge in speed and efficiency. Benchmarking tests are needed to confirm this.
  • Software Updates: The Galaxy A35 launches with Android 14, offering potential advantages in terms of features and longer-term software support compared to the Moto G34's Android 13.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices target the mid-range market, appealing to users seeking a balance of features and affordability. However, the Galaxy A35's superior display and potential performance advantages might attract users prioritizing multimedia consumption and gaming.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

  • 5G Adoption: Both devices support 5G, aligning with the ongoing global transition to faster mobile networks.
  • Software Support Lifecycle: The duration of software updates and security patches will be a crucial factor in the long-term value proposition of each device. Samsung historically has had longer support than Motorola.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Moto G34 offers a solid feature set, the Samsung Galaxy A35 presents a more compelling package overall. Its superior Super AMOLED display, newer processor technology (Exynos 1380), and the likelihood of longer software support make it a more future-proof choice. The enhanced video recording capabilities further strengthen its appeal for multimedia-focused users. While benchmark testing is needed to confirm real-world performance differences, the architectural advantages of the Exynos 1380 suggest a likely edge over the Snapdragon 695. Finally, the jump to Android 14 positions the Galaxy A35 favorably in terms of features and long-term software updates, which is crucial for sustained performance and security in the rapidly evolving mobile landscape.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.