Motorola Moto G32 vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 16, 2022 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 101.5 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 184 g 192 g
Height 161.8 mm 168 mm
Width 73.8 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.26 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G32 vs. Xiaomi Poco C65: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto G32 and the Xiaomi Poco C65, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G32Xiaomi Poco C65Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5168 x 78 x 8.1Poco C65 is slightly larger and heavier. Moto G32 might feel more compact in hand.
Weight (g)184192Noticeable difference in weight, though both are relatively light.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.74Poco C65 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1600Moto G32 boasts significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution and pixel density (405 ppi vs. 260 ppi). Text and images will be crisper.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth phones offer smooth scrolling and animations.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDExpect similar color reproduction and viewing angles, though real-world display quality can vary.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680Helio G85Snapdragon 680 generally offers better power efficiency. Helio G85 might have a slight edge in raw performance, but benchmarks will tell more.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreCore configurations differ; real-world performance depends on optimization and usage patterns.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G52 MC2Adreno 610 generally provides a smoother gaming experience.
RAM4/6/8GB4/6/8GBRAM options are comparable; more RAM enables better multitasking.
Storage64/128/256GB128/256GBMoto G32 offers a smaller base storage option.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPBoth use the same Samsung JN1 sensor, promising good image quality. Real-world performance depends on software processing.
Secondary Cameras8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro2MP depth, 2MP macroMoto G32's ultrawide lens offers greater versatility than Poco C65's depth sensor.
Selfie Camera16MP8MPMoto G32 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable longevity.
Charging30W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingMoto G32 charges significantly faster.
Other
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
OSAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 13Moto G32 has a confirmed update path to Android 13. Poco C65 is newer so it could have more updated to come.
PriceMid-rangeBudget-friendlyPoco C65 is generally more affordable.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The Moto G32's sharper display is a major advantage for media consumption and overall clarity.
  • Performance: While both chipsets are capable, the Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G32 likely offers better efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life under similar usage. The Adreno 610 GPU may have an advantage for some games.
  • Camera: Both phones feature a 50MP main camera, but the Moto G32's inclusion of an ultrawide lens provides more shooting flexibility.
  • Charging: The Moto G32's 30W fast charging significantly outpaces the Poco C65's 18W, minimizing downtime.
  • Value: The Poco C65 offers a larger display and larger base storage for a lower price, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G32: Best suited for users who prioritize display quality, a versatile camera system, and faster charging. Ideal for media consumption, light gaming, and everyday tasks.
  • Poco C65: A good choice for budget-conscious users who prefer a large screen and ample storage. Suitable for basic tasks, social media, and casual gaming. The lower price makes it attractive for those seeking maximum value.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? If price is a primary concern, the Poco C65 offers excellent value.
  2. How important is display quality? If you value sharp visuals, the Moto G32 is the clear winner.
  3. What are your photography needs? The Moto G32's ultrawide lens adds versatility for capturing landscapes and group photos.

My Choice: As a tech journalist who values performance, a good display, and a versatile camera, I would choose the Motorola Moto G32. The sharper display, faster charging, and the inclusion of an ultrawide lens outweigh the Poco C65's price advantage for my personal needs. The slightly smaller size of the G32 also appeals to me. While the Poco C65 provides incredible value, the G32 offers a more well-rounded experience that aligns better with my daily usage patterns.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.