Motorola Moto G32 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 16, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 101.5 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 184 g 213 g
Height 161.8 mm 161.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.26 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 18

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G32 and the Samsung Galaxy A55, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G32Samsung Galaxy A55Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly wider, both slim and pocketable.
Weight (g)184213G32 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDA55 boasts richer colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility.
Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Comparable sharpness; A55 slightly less due to larger size.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120A55 offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GExynos 1480 5GA55 significantly faster and more power-efficient, with 5G capability.
CPUOcta-core (2.4 GHz)Octa-core (2.75 GHz)A55 handles demanding tasks and multitasking more effectively.
GPUAdreno 610Xclipse 530A55 offers superior graphics performance for gaming and media.
RAM (GB)68A55 provides smoother multitasking and app switching.
OSAndroid 12Android 14A55 comes with a newer OS, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Both offer high resolution; sensor quality is key differentiator.
SensorSamsung S5KJN1Sony IMX906A55 likely has better low-light performance and dynamic range.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA55 records higher resolution video.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity; real-world usage will depend on efficiency.
Charging (W)3025G32 charges slightly faster despite lower wattage due to optimization.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A55 emerges as the more powerful and feature-rich device. Its Exynos 1480 processor, 5G connectivity, superior AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, and enhanced camera system position it as a strong contender in the mid-range segment.

The Motorola Moto G32, while less powerful, offers a lighter weight and potentially a longer battery life due to its lower power consumption processor and optimized fast charging. It caters to users prioritizing a comfortable, lightweight experience for essential tasks.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G32: Ideal for budget-conscious users seeking a reliable phone for everyday communication, social media, and light browsing. Its long battery life and lighter weight make it great for extended use without fatigue.

Samsung A55: Suitable for users who demand more performance for demanding tasks, mobile gaming, media consumption, and high-quality photography. 5G connectivity ensures future-proofing.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The G32 is more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Light tasks vs. demanding apps and gaming.
  3. How important is future-proofing with 5G? The A55 offers 5G connectivity.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Moto G32
  • Balanced Performance and Value: Samsung A55 (if budget allows)
  • Future-Proofing and Performance: Samsung A55

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

If I were choosing between these two, I'd opt for the Samsung Galaxy A55. While the Moto G32 offers a compelling value proposition for its price, the A55's superior performance, stunning AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, more advanced camera system, and the inclusion of 5G make it a more compelling device for my needs. As a tech journalist, I often push my devices to their limits with multitasking, media editing, and on-the-go content creation. The A55's powerful processor and future-proof connectivity align better with my workflow. The slightly higher price is a justifiable trade-off for the significant jump in overall performance and user experience. Additionally, the enhanced camera capabilities of the A55, particularly the improved low-light performance and 4K video recording, are essential for capturing high-quality images and videos for my articles.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.