Motorola Moto G32 vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 16, 2022 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 101.5 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 184 g 197 g
Height 161.8 mm 161 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.26 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 18

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G32 vs. Samsung Galaxy A25: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone User

Let's cut through the marketing fluff and get down to brass tacks. We're comparing the Motorola Moto G32 and the Samsung Galaxy A25, two mid-range contenders vying for your attention. I've spent time dissecting their specs and translating them into real-world implications, so you can make a smart choice.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G32Samsung Galaxy A25Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5161 x 76.5 x 8.3A25 slightly wider, G32 slightly taller. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)184197A25 slightly heavier, but unlikely to be noticeable in daily use.
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzA25 boasts richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling thanks to AMOLED and 120Hz.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GExynos 1280 5GA25's Exynos 1280 offers significantly better performance and 5G connectivity.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz)A25's CPU architecture provides a performance edge, especially in multitasking.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G68A25's Mali-G68 delivers superior graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps.
RAM6GB6GBBoth offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPComparable resolution; real-world image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA25 significantly outperforms in video recording capabilities with 4K resolution.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity; actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A25 demonstrably outperforms the Moto G32 in key areas. Its Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate provides a visually superior experience, making everything from scrolling through social media to playing games smoother and more vibrant. The Exynos 1280 chipset, coupled with the Mali-G68 GPU, delivers a noticeable performance boost, handling demanding tasks with greater ease. The A25's ability to record 4K video is another significant advantage. While both phones offer comparable battery capacity and main camera resolution, the A25's superior processor and software could result in better battery optimization and image processing.

The Moto G32, however, might appeal to users seeking a cleaner Android experience and potentially a more affordable price point, depending on the specific configuration and retailer.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G32: Best suited for budget-conscious users prioritizing basic smartphone functionality, a clean Android experience, and all-day battery life. Ideal for casual web browsing, social media, and light gaming.

  • Samsung Galaxy A25: A better fit for users who value a premium display, smoother performance, superior camera capabilities (especially video), and 5G connectivity. Suitable for demanding tasks, mobile gaming, and content creation.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is 5G connectivity a must-have? If yes, the A25 is the only option.
  2. How important is display quality and overall performance? If these are top priorities, the A25's AMOLED display and powerful processor are clear winners.
  3. What's your budget? While both are mid-range, compare prices for specific configurations as the G32 might offer better value at the lower end.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A25

While the Moto G32 is a respectable contender in the budget-midrange arena, the Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a compelling combination of performance, display quality, and future-proofing with 5G. As someone who values a fluid user experience and appreciates a vibrant display, the A25's Super AMOLED screen and 120Hz refresh rate are major selling points. The Exynos 1280's performance advantage and the ability to capture 4K video further solidify the A25 as the superior choice for my needs. The slightly higher price tag is justifiable for the significant upgrade in overall user experience and longevity provided by 5G connectivity.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.