Motorola Moto G32 vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 16, 2022 September 2, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 101.5 cm³ 106.84 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 184 g 197 g
Height 161.8 mm 165.4 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.9 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 82.5 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.26 mAh/cm³ 46.8 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G32 vs. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G32 and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, two mid-range contenders vying for your attention. We'll go beyond the spec sheet, translating technical jargon into real-world implications for your daily usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G32Samsung Galaxy A23 5GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4A23 5G is slightly larger and heavier. Negligible difference in daily handling.
Weight (g)184197G32 feels lighter in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.6A23 5G offers a marginally larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2408Virtually identical sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120A23 5G's 120Hz delivers smoother scrolling and animations, noticeable in everyday use.
TypeIPS LCDPLS LCDBoth are LCD panels; expect good color reproduction but lower contrast than AMOLED.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GSnapdragon 695 5G695 5G offers better CPU and GPU performance, plus 5G connectivity - significant for future-proofing.
CPUOcta-core (2.4 GHz)Octa-core (2.2 GHz)695 5G, despite lower clock speed, boasts a more powerful architecture resulting in better performance.
RAM (GB)64G32's 6GB RAM allows for smoother multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Both use the same Samsung JN1 sensor; image quality should be comparable.
OISNoYesA23 5G's Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) results in steadier videos and potentially better low-light photos.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity; real-world endurance depends on usage and software optimization.
Fast Charging30W25WG32 charges slightly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Snapdragon 695 5G in the A23 5G offers a significant performance advantage and crucial 5G future-proofing. The G32's 680 4G is capable for everyday tasks, but demanding apps or games will run smoother on the A23 5G.
  • Display: The A23 5G's 120Hz refresh rate is a game-changer for fluidity and responsiveness. Scrolling, gaming, and even basic navigation feel significantly smoother compared to the G32's 90Hz.
  • Camera: While both phones have a 50MP main sensor, the A23 5G's Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) gives it an edge in video recording and low-light photography. Expect sharper videos and less blurry photos in challenging conditions.
  • Future-Proofing: The A23 5G's inclusion of 5G connectivity ensures faster data speeds and better network access in the coming years, making it a more viable long-term investment.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G32: Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Its clean Android experience and decent battery life are appealing.
  • Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: Ideal for users who want a more future-proof device with better performance, smoother display, and enhanced camera capabilities. The inclusion of 5G makes it a good choice for those who want to stay ahead of the curve.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is 5G connectivity important to you? If yes, the A23 5G is the only option.
  2. Are you a heavy gamer or multitasker? If yes, the A23 5G's superior performance will be beneficial.
  3. Is a smooth and responsive display a priority? If yes, the A23 5G's 120Hz refresh rate will make a noticeable difference.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

While the Moto G32 is a solid budget option, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G offers compelling advantages that justify the potential price difference. The future-proof 5G connectivity, noticeably smoother 120Hz display, more powerful processor, and the inclusion of OIS for the camera make it a more well-rounded and capable device in the long run. Even though it has less RAM than the Moto G32, the performance gains from the better processor outweigh the benefits of the extra RAM in the G32. For me, these features enhance the daily user experience significantly, making the A23 5G the clear winner.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.