Motorola Moto G32 vs Samsung Galaxy A14 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 16, 2022 March 27, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 101.5 cm³ 119.03 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.28 "/g
Weight 184 g 201 g
Height 161.8 mm 167.7 mm
Width 73.8 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 80.2 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.26 mAh/cm³ 42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G32 vs. Samsung Galaxy A14: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto G32 and the Samsung Galaxy A14, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer in terms of real-world performance.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G32Samsung Galaxy A14Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5167.7 x 78 x 9.1A14 is slightly larger and heavier; G32 feels more compact.
Weight (g)184201G32 is noticeably lighter for comfortable one-handed use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2408Virtually identical sharpness; both offer crisp visuals.
Panel TypeIPS LCD, 90HzPLS LCDG32's 90Hz refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GHelio G80G32's Snapdragon chip generally offers better performance & efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2.4 GHz)Octa-core (2.0 GHz)G32 likely has a slight edge in processing power.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G52 MC2G32's GPU might provide a smoother gaming experience.
RAM4/6/8GB4/6GBMore RAM options on the G32 cater to power users.
OSAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 13Both run Android, but G32 has a confirmed upgrade path to 13.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution on paper; real-world image quality needs testing.
Front Camera (MP)1613G32 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity; actual battery life depends on usage.
Fast Charging30W15WG32 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Moto G32, with its Snapdragon 680, is likely to outperform the Galaxy A14 in everyday tasks and gaming. The higher refresh rate display further enhances the G32's fluidity.
  • Camera: While both have 50MP main cameras, sensor quality and image processing will ultimately determine the real-world results. The G32's higher-resolution selfie camera could appeal to selfie enthusiasts.
  • Charging: The G32's 30W fast charging is a clear advantage over the A14's 15W, minimizing downtime significantly.
  • Software: Both phones run on Android, but the G32's confirmed upgrade path to Android 13 offers a longer software support horizon.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G32: Best suited for users who prioritize performance, a smooth display, and faster charging. Gamers, multitaskers, and those who consume media heavily would appreciate the G32's capabilities.
  • Samsung Galaxy A14: A good option for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and a large screen for casual use. If top-tier performance isn't a primary concern, the A14 offers a solid foundation.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The A14 generally comes at a lower price point, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers.
  2. Is performance a priority? If speed and responsiveness are crucial, the G32 is the better choice.
  3. How important is fast charging? The G32's 30W fast charging is a significant advantage if you need your phone to top up quickly.

My Choice: The Motorola Moto G32

If I were choosing between these two, I'd go with the Motorola Moto G32. While the Galaxy A14 is a respectable contender in the budget segment, the G32 offers a more compelling overall package. The Snapdragon 680, combined with the 90Hz display, promises a significantly smoother and more responsive user experience. The faster charging is a huge plus for me, as it minimizes downtime. While the A14 boasts 5G connectivity in some variants (not specified in this data), 4G speeds are sufficient for my needs, and the G32's performance advantages outweigh the lack of 5G, especially considering potential price differences. I appreciate the confirmed Android 13 update for the G32, ensuring longer-term software support and access to the latest features. Ultimately, the G32's superior performance, faster charging, and smoother display make it the winner in my book.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.